Try Free

Massie CONFRONTS Hegseth with Maxwell Secret Recording — Hegseth STUNNED in Hearing

The Hill Report June 18, 2026 13m 1,952 words 1 views
▶ Watch original video

About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Massie CONFRONTS Hegseth with Maxwell Secret Recording — Hegseth STUNNED in Hearing from The Hill Report, published June 18, 2026. The transcript contains 1,952 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.

"Massey pressed play. 11 seconds. A woman's voice. Then a man's voice responding. Then Massey pressed stop, looked directly at Hegseth and said, That's you, isn't it? Hegseth did not answer for 19 seconds. If you are new to The Hill Report, subscribe right now. Because what happened in those 19..."

[0:00] Massey pressed play. 11 seconds. A woman's voice. Then a man's voice responding. [0:08] Then Massey pressed stop, looked directly at Hegseth and said, [0:13] That's you, isn't it? Hegseth did not answer for 19 seconds. [0:19] If you are new to The Hill Report, subscribe right now. [0:23] Because what happened in those 19 seconds and in the four minutes before Massey pressed play [0:28] is now in the permanent congressional record. And it is not going away. [0:33] House Oversight Committee. Wednesday morning, 11.04 a.m. Eastern, [0:40] the hearing had been billed, on the official schedule, as a follow-up session on Pentagon [0:44] contracting oversight. The kind of hearing that, on a normal week, draws a handful of staffers [0:50] and almost no press at all. By 10.50 a.m., the press gallery was full. [0:56] Word had moved through the building overnight that Massey had requested a closed-door evidentiary [1:00] review four days earlier, citing material his office had obtained through a chain of custody [1:05] that originated with a 2021 federal forfeiture case. Nobody outside a small group knew exactly [1:12] what the material was, though the rumor mill had attached several names to it by the time [1:17] the hearing gaveled in. The committee chairman had granted Massey 10 additional minutes of [1:22] questioning time, an unusual accommodation, the kind that committee staff do not grant without [1:28] first reviewing at least a summary of what is going to be introduced. And that itself signaled [1:33] something to the people in that room who knew how these procedures normally work. Massey arrived [1:38] with a single device and a folder. Nothing else. He sat down. He did not look at notes. There were no [1:44] notes. Just the folder and the device. He looked at Hegseth and said, Mr. Secretary, before I ask you [1:53] anything, I want to play something. 30 seconds. He set the device on the table. Screen down. What Massey [2:01] played was a short audio clip, 11 seconds, recovered from digital media seized during the 2021 federal [2:08] investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell's financial records and personal effects. The clip had been [2:14] logged into evidence at the time, reviewed by federal investigators in the original case, and marked in [2:19] the evidence log as containing a voice that investigators at the time could not conclusively [2:24] identify and did not have reason to pursue further given the scope of that investigation. [2:28] It had remained in a sealed evidence file for four years, untouched, one item among thousands. [2:36] Massey's office had obtained access to that file through a declassification request tied to a [2:41] separate, broader congressional inquiry into DOJ evidence handling practices, the same inquiry that [2:47] had already produced, in earlier hearings this committee has covered, documents on redaction [2:53] discrepancies and unresolved DOJ review flags going back years. In the course of that inquiry, [2:58] almost as a side note to the original purpose of the request, Massey's office had run the [3:03] unidentified voice on the 2021 clip through a voice matching analysis against a database of [3:09] Hegseth's public remarks, congressional testimony, and media appearances spanning more than a decade. [3:15] The analysis came back with what Massey's office described, in the document now sitting in his [3:20] folder, as a high confidence match. Massey pressed play. The clip ran. 11 seconds. A woman's voice. Brief. A few words. The recording [3:33] quality consistent with an older digital file. The kind of audio artifact that comes from a device that has been sitting in an [3:40] evidence locker for years. Then a second voice. A man's. Also brief. Overlapping the first by less than a second. The way real [3:50] conversations overlap and scripted ones don't. The clip ended. Massey pressed stop. The room was [3:58] completely silent. Not the rustling silence of people reaching for documents, which is the silence [4:04] this committee usually produces. The flat, immediate silence of a room where something has just been [4:09] played that nobody expected to hear in this setting. In this building. On a Wednesday morning, billed as a [4:15] routine follow-up. And everyone present is recalibrating in real time what kind of hearing [4:21] this actually turned out to be. Massey set the device down. He looked at Hegseth. He did not raise [4:29] his voice. That's you, isn't it? Hegseth's lead attorney was on his feet before the chairman could [4:37] even begin to respond. Mr. Chairman, I have to object. The provenance of whatever was just played has not [4:45] been established for this committee. Its chain of custody has not been verified in this proceeding. And any [4:51] suggestion regarding my client's voice on an unauthenticated recording is. Massey did not look at the [4:57] attorney. He did not raise his voice to match the interruption. He simply opened his folder. This is the [5:04] 2021 evidence log. He held it up so the chamber display could capture it. Item number. Date of seizure. [5:13] Custodial chain. Unbroken. Four years of sealed storage. And the declassification authorization. [5:19] Signed 11 days ago. He set it down on the table beside the device. The chain of custody is in this [5:26] folder. It has already been provided to the committee, to the chairman's office, and to counsel for the [5:32] secretary. 72 hours before this hearing began. I'm asking the secretary a direct question. The chairman [5:40] looked at both parties for a long moment. Then, the objection regarding characterization is noted. The [5:47] secretary may respond to the question as posed. Hegseth looked at his attorneys. Then, at the folder, [5:52] still sitting open on the table. Then, at the device. Closed now. Between them. He said nothing. [6:01] One second. Three. The chairman did not prompt him. Did not offer to repeat the question or move on. [6:10] The way chairmen sometimes do when a witness hesitates. Massey did not repeat the question [6:16] either. He simply sat, looking at Hegseth, the folder still open in front of him. Eight seconds. [6:22] Twelve. Fifteen. In the press gallery, several reporters had stopped typing entirely, watching [6:30] the dace instead of their screens. Eighteen seconds. At 19 seconds, Hegseth leaned toward the microphone [6:38] and said, I'd like to consult with counsel before responding to that. The Hill report. Stop here. [6:44] Because 19 seconds of silence from a sitting cabinet secretary, in response to a yes or no question [6:50] about a recording connected to a federal forfeiture case, is itself now part of the record, independent [6:56] of whatever the recording actually contains. The silence is documented. The time stamp is documented. [7:05] And the request to consult counsel before answering whether a voice is your own voice is. [7:10] Procedurally, an unusual response to what should be among the easiest questions a person can be asked. [7:16] Subscribe to the Hill report right now and hit the bell. Because Massey was not finished. And what he said [7:25] next is the part that turned this into something the chamber had not produced before. The recess lasted [7:32] six minutes. Longer than most. When the hearing resumed, the room had a different texture to it. The kind of [7:39] quiet that follows a recess everyone knows was not procedural. Hegseth's attorney spoke first, before Massey [7:46] could resume his line of questioning. Mr. Chairman, my client is unable to confirm or deny the identity [7:53] of any voice on a recording whose authentication process has not been completed in this proceeding. [7:58] And any further questioning along these lines should occur, if at all, in a closed setting given the [8:03] sensitive nature of the underlying case and the individuals associated with it. Massey looked at the [8:09] attorney for a moment, then at the chairman. Then he reached into his folder and pulled out a second [8:17] document, separate from the evidence log. This is the voice matching analysis, conducted by an [8:23] independent forensic audio firm, comparing the recording to 23 hours of the secretary's recorded [8:29] public remarks spanning 11 years. Committee testimony, interviews, public addresses, all of it lawfully [8:37] obtained, and on the public record already. He set it on the table next to the evidence log. [8:44] The analysis concluded a confidence interval of 94%. He looked at Hegseth directly. 94%. Mr. Secretary, [8:54] he let that sit for a moment. I'm not asking you to authenticate the recording. The recording is [9:01] already authenticated. It's in a federal evidence file with an unbroken chain of custody that predates [9:06] this hearing by four years. I'm asking you something much simpler. I'm asking whether you recognize [9:13] your own voice. Hegseth's response when it came was not a denial. Senator, Congressman, I want to be [9:23] clear that I have no knowledge of the context, the date, or the circumstances under which any recording [9:28] referenced here was made, and I categorically reject any implication arising from association with [9:34] names connected to that case. Massey looked at him. He did not raise his voice. He did not need to. [9:41] I didn't ask about context. I didn't ask about implication. He set the forensic report down next [9:48] to the evidence log, the two documents now side by side on the table between them. 94%. He looked at [9:56] the chairman. Mr. Chairman, I move to enter both documents into the congressional record, the 2021 [10:03] evidence log with its full chain of custody, and the independent voice matching analysis with its [10:08] complete methodology appendix. I further move that this committee formally request the unredacted case [10:14] file from the Department of Justice, including all associated recordings and their full chain of [10:19] custody documentation, for review in closed session at the earliest available date. The room, which had [10:26] been still for most of the exchange, broke open at that. Three members were speaking at once, two asking [10:32] procedural questions about the closed session request, one objecting that the matter belonged with [10:37] the Judiciary Committee rather than oversight. The chairman gaveled twice. Hegseth's second attorney was [10:45] now standing as well. Both attorneys conferring rapidly while their clients sat motionless, [10:49] hands flat on the table, looking at neither the folder nor the device, but at a fixed point [10:54] somewhere past the days. For the first time in the hearing, he did not appear to be calculating a [11:00] response. He appeared to simply be waiting for the room to move past him. When the chairman [11:05] restored order, both motions were seconded immediately and passed without recorded objection. [11:10] Massey looked at Hegseth one final time. [11:14] Mr. Secretary, I'm not going to characterize what's on that recording beyond what the evidence [11:18] log already says. He paused. But I will say this. 19 seconds is a long time to think about whether [11:25] that's your voice. The hearing adjourned shortly after. Hegseth left without speaking to reporters [11:31] waiting near the exit, walking quickly through a side hallway with both attorneys flanking him. [11:36] The Pentagon Press Office issued a one-line statement late that evening stating that the secretary [11:42] categorically denies any wrongdoing, a statement that, as several outlets noted within hours, [11:49] carefully avoided the actual question on the table. It did not deny that the voice on the [11:54] recording was his. It did not address the 94% figure. It did not address the 19 seconds. [12:01] The 2021 evidence log, the declassification authorization, and the independent forensic [12:09] voice matching analysis are now part of the permanent House Oversight Committee record. [12:13] The closed session request to the DOJ has not yet been answered, and no timeline for a response has [12:19] been provided. Subscribe to The Hill Report right now and share this video with everyone you know [12:25] immediately. Tomorrow, we release the full evidence log with chain of custody timestamps, [12:32] the complete forensic voice matching report with its methodology appendix, and the 19-second [12:38] exchange transcribed second by second exactly as it appears in the official record. [12:42] Massey played 11 seconds. Hegseth was silent for 19. The Pentagon statement, when it finally came, [12:52] didn't deny anything. Share this video. The record is public, and the silence is in it.

Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free

Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →