About this transcript: This is a full AI-generated transcript of Acting AG Todd Blanche, Rep. Jamie Raskin and more — Face the Nation Full Broadcast - April 26, 2026 from Face the Nation, published April 28, 2026. The transcript contains 7,840 words with timestamps and was generated using Whisper AI.
"Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation. I'm Margaret Brennan. Washington is waking up to what still feels to those of us who were in attendance, or even those watching on live television, to be an unreal experience. But it's an experience that's becoming more and more common in these times of..."
[0:15] Good morning and welcome to Face the Nation. I'm Margaret Brennan.
[0:18] Washington is waking up to what still feels to those of us who were in attendance,
[0:23] or even those watching on live television, to be an unreal experience.
[0:29] But it's an experience that's becoming more and more common in these times of political turmoil.
[0:35] Last night at the annual White House Correspondents Association dinner,
[0:39] shots rang out as President Trump and his Cabinet, members of Congress,
[0:43] and hundreds of journalists attended the annual event honoring the First Amendment,
[0:48] freedom of the press. Secret Service agents quickly tackled the alleged shooter outside the ballroom
[0:53] following a brief exchange of gunfire. A Secret Service agent was hit during the attack,
[0:58] but protected from serious injury by his bulletproof vest.
[1:02] The president praised the quick actions of law enforcement that prevented the assailant
[1:07] from entering the ballroom, a breach which could have led to a more tragic outcome.
[1:12] We've got a lot to get to, including an interview with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
[1:17] But we begin with a report from senior White House and political correspondent Ed O'Keefe.
[1:22] Attending the dinner for the first time as Commander-in-Chief,
[1:29] President Trump took his place at the front of the room.
[1:33] And we're going to get started now, so enjoy your dinner, and we'll be back. Thank you.
[1:37] Eleven minutes later, as guests settle into their meals,
[1:42] mentalist Oz Perlman, the scheduled entertainer, was showing the president and First Lady a trick.
[1:48] Then, in the back of the room, plates crashed as attendees dove to the floor and under tables.
[2:03] Some could smell gunpowder. In 10 seconds, the Secret Service surrounded and whisked out the first
[2:10] couple. They nearly lifted the vice president out of the room. Surveillance footage shows the suspect,
[2:16] 31-year-old Cole Thomas Allen of Torrance, California, raced by magnetometers just a
[2:22] staircase above the ballroom. He was quickly tackled and apprehended.
[2:27] With the suspect detained, guests climbed up from under the tables and picked themselves off the
[2:32] floor. Secret Service began to secure the room and the kitchen. It started sweeping out other senior
[2:39] officials. The Treasury Secretary, the House Speaker, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F.
[2:47] Kennedy Jr., whose father and uncle were assassinated. Also in attendance, Erica Kirk,
[2:56] whose husband, conservative activist Charlie Kirk, was assassinated last year.
[3:01] The White House Correspondents' Dinner is one of the biggest events of Washington's social calendar,
[3:07] held at the Washington Hilton, one of the Capitol's largest public spaces. It's also where President
[3:14] Ronald Reagan was shot in March 1981, after speaking in the very same ballroom. The president,
[3:21] who'd wanted to continue with the dinner, was held backstage by Secret Service for more than an hour.
[3:26] When he returned to the White House, he and Cabinet Secretaries headed to the briefing room.
[3:31] REP. RONALD REAGAN, President, President of the White House Secretary,
[3:32] In that moment when you realize there was a threat and service agents were telling us to get down,
[3:38] can you describe what was going through your mind, how you were feeling in that moment?
[3:44] It's always shocking when something like this happens. Happened to me a little bit. And that never
[3:51] changes. The fact, we were sitting right next to each other, the first lady on my right, and I heard a noise
[4:00] and sort of thought it was a tray. I thought it was a tray going down. I've heard that many times,
[4:06] and it was pretty loud noise. And it was from quite far away. He hadn't breached the area at all.
[4:12] They really got him. But, so it was quite far away. But it was a gun. And some people
[4:20] really understood that pretty quickly. Other people didn't.
[4:22] When asked about the uptick in political violence last night, President Trump said he
[4:27] tries not to dwell on it, but called his line of work, quote, a dangerous profession.
[4:32] It was the third instance of a gunman in his vicinity in less than two years.
[4:36] Margaret. Ed O'Keefe, still in last night's
[4:39] tuxedo because you, like so many people on this program and at this network,
[4:43] worked through the night. Thank you.
[4:45] That's what we do.
[4:45] Nicole Skanga, our Homeland Security and Justice
[4:49] correspondent, is here with more on the investigation. Nicole, what do we know?
[4:54] Yeah, Margaret, multiple sources tell CBS News that the gunman told law enforcement he was
[5:00] targeting Trump administration officials. Sources now say that Allen's brother had also alerted
[5:07] local police of alleged alarming writings that he shared with the family prior to the incident.
[5:15] CCTV video reveals the moment the 31-year-old suspect sprinted past a security checkpoint,
[5:22] charging toward the ballroom where President Trump,
[5:24] Cabinet officials and roughly 2,500 guests were assembled.
[5:29] It is clear, based upon what we know so far,
[5:32] that this individual was intent on doing as much harm and as much damage as he could.
[5:37] Cole Allen, a teacher from Southern California,
[5:40] opened fire at a uniformed division officer of the U.S. Secret Service
[5:45] before agents tackled him to the ground, handcuffing him.
[5:48] He was armed with a shotgun, a handgun, and multiple knives.
[5:53] As he ran through that checkpoint, members of law enforcement from the United States
[5:56] Secret Service intercepted that individual. Shouts of watch for crossfire as Secret Service
[6:03] personnel and D.C. police rushed to the scene, agents from inside the ballroom and medics from
[6:09] outside the hotel. Investigators are now combing through a hotel room at the Washington Hilton.
[6:15] Authorities have also begun searching his California residents.
[6:19] The public should also rest assured that there will be no stone unturned during this investigation.
[6:26] According to his LinkedIn profile, the suspect worked for a tutoring and test prep company
[6:31] and was awarded Teacher of the Month back in 2024.
[6:35] He'd finished a master's in computer science last year.
[6:39] He's now facing two felony charges, including assault on a federal officer.
[6:44] White House officials tell our CBS News' Jennifer Jacobs that authorities have found
[6:50] anti-Trump and anti-Christian rhetoric on the suspect's social media accounts.
[6:55] We're also told by law enforcement sources both of his firearms were purchased legally in California.
[7:01] As for the defendant, Margaret, he'll appear in federal court tomorrow.
[7:07] We go now to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche. Welcome. Good morning. And I'm glad you are safe, sir.
[7:16] It was a harrowing night. Good morning. You as well.
[7:19] It was a harrowing night. I want to get straight to what we know now in the light of day.
[7:25] The FBI, as I understand it, has gone to a home in Torrance, California, believed to belong to the
[7:32] alleged shooter, most likely into his D.C. hotel room as well. What have they discovered there? What do we know?
[7:38] Yes, that's right. So the FBI worked all night working with local law enforcement,
[7:43] working with the Secret Service. They've executed various search warrants on locations, also on
[7:48] devices that were recovered from the suspect. This investigation is just over 12 hours old,
[7:55] so we still are actively looking at everything that happened. But as of now, we have collected
[8:03] a fair amount of evidence, which we're now going through.
[8:05] Any indication at this point that he was part of a group? Was there any foreign nexus to the
[8:12] inspiration for the violence he attempted last night?
[8:15] We're still looking into motivation, and that's something that hopefully we'll learn over the next
[8:20] couple of days. We do believe, based upon just a very preliminary start to understanding what happened,
[8:26] that he was targeting members of the administration. We don't have specifics beyond that kind of general
[8:33] statement from what we've learned so far. But we're actively talking to witnesses that knew him,
[8:38] and talking to other individuals, and going through the material that we've collected. So I expect that
[8:43] you will hear more about that in the coming days.
[8:47] You mentioned a statement. Is the alleged shooter sharing details on what he was attempting to do?
[8:55] What makes you say it was a threat to administration officials writ large?
[9:00] Just based on the evidence we've collected, not a statement from the suspect, just from
[9:06] what we've learned in our preliminary investigation. He's not actively cooperating. I expect that he
[9:12] will be formally charged tomorrow morning in federal court in Washington, D.C., and we'll go from there.
[9:18] So the Secret Service has said that the suspected gunman was staying in the hotel. He walked up to
[9:23] a security checkpoint with a shotgun, handgun, and multiple knives. How long had he been
[9:29] inside that hotel? And was there a security protocol for guests?
[9:35] We're still understanding the security protocols that led to him being able to have firearms in
[9:41] that hotel. We do believe he was staying in the hotel in the days leading up to last night. We
[9:47] believe that he traveled by train from Los Angeles to Chicago, and then from Chicago to Washington, D.C.
[9:54] As far as what happened with him coming down and breaching the perimeter, as you've seen from some
[10:02] videos that have already been released, he was apprehended and subdued feet away from breaking the
[10:08] perimeter. So we were all safe inside, and that's a testament to the Secret Service doing their job and
[10:15] the law enforcement doing exactly what we hope and expect them to do in a time. They trained for this
[10:22] their entire careers, and many of them never actually see it happen in real time, and it happened last
[10:28] night, and they reacted exactly as they should have.
[10:31] So the alleged shooter, as we just said, had multiple weapons in his possession. Here in the
[10:36] District of Columbia, open carry is not permitted. You just said he traveled from California across the country by train.
[10:43] At this point, are you thinking at the federal level of changing security protocols in any way to,
[10:51] for example, match on trains what you are expected to go through when you fly, where you do have to
[10:58] declare a weapon when you cross state lines? How did he travel by train without any challenge and arrive
[11:04] here in the nation's capital? Look, this isn't about, in my mind, changing the law or making the laws more
[11:10] restrictive around possession of firearms. It appears he purchased these firearms the past couple years.
[11:16] We don't know how those firearms ended up in his possession in D.C. We can, we can make some
[11:21] assumptions based upon what I just said about how he got to D.C., but I don't, I don't think the
[11:27] narrative here is about changing laws or changing, making, making our laws more restrictive. This is
[11:33] about law enforcement who are doing their jobs and, and, and a suspect who, who tried to do something
[11:39] and, and failed miserably. Well, I'm not talking about changing the law in terms of possession of
[11:43] a firearm. I'm asking about crossing state lines with that firearm and arriving the Capitol. If you
[11:47] try to fly, you do have to have your firearms declared in some way. You don't when you get on a
[11:53] train. Well, look, you are talking about, I mean, if we're asking the question, that's talking about
[11:58] changing the laws. And, and I don't think that's something that we should be focused on right now in any way,
[12:02] shape or form. Okay, not a loophole. There are lots of ways that, yeah. So, I mean, look, the,
[12:07] we don't, and we also don't know, we don't have all the answers this morning. We're still looking
[12:11] into, into what happened, how he got the guns, if he got them legally. But what we do know is, is that,
[12:17] is that he tried to use them. He did have two firearms and some knives on his person when he tried to use
[12:22] them. And, and he was stopped before he got anywhere near the president, before he got near any of us that
[12:28] were in the room at the time of that, that this occurred. And, and that's, that's, again, we
[12:33] can't, we can't overlook, and I'm not suggesting you are, but we can't overlook the great work of the
[12:38] Secret Service last night. No, absolutely. We're all thankful for that. But we do see these kind of
[12:43] threats at the local and state level as well for those who aren't as heavily protected as all of us in
[12:48] that room were last night, which is why I ask you if you're reviewing that. U.S. Attorney for the District of
[12:55] Columbia, Janine Pirro, said the suspect will be charged with two counts, using a firearm during
[13:00] a violent crime and assault on a federal officer using a dangerous weapon. Do you at this point
[13:05] anticipate further charges? Yes, I, I, we'll see about further charges. So that's one of the things
[13:12] that, that we need to go through the evidence. So there's a lot of federal charges that could be in
[13:16] play beyond those two charges. But it depends on what, it depends on, on us understanding his motive,
[13:21] his intent, his premeditation, that what led into him, him deciding that he was going to do what he
[13:27] did last night. But just to be clear, those are very serious charges. He will have a, he will face a
[13:34] judge as early as tomorrow morning for those two charges. But, but the investigation is, is, is brand
[13:39] new. And so we will continue to investigate. And if there's more charges, they'll, they'll be brought.
[13:44] He'll be charged via complaint and that'll be tomorrow morning. And then an indictment will come,
[13:49] will come thereafter. And there could be additional charges in that indictment. But,
[13:53] but we have to see as the evidence develops. So you must have attended past correspondence dinner.
[14:00] I mean, for, for over 50 years, they've been held at this hotel. Last night, it was extraordinary
[14:07] because we had the president, the vice president, the speaker of the house, the secretary of state,
[14:13] the secretary of defense, the secretary of the treasury, all in the same room.
[14:17] Those are five out of the top six leaders in that, that line of succession for this country,
[14:23] should something have actually happened to the president himself.
[14:27] Was there planning for that? I mean, when we have the state of the union,
[14:30] there's a designated survivor. Was there an increased concern
[14:33] about gathering all of our leadership in that room last night?
[14:37] We will not stop doing things like we did last night in this administration. And this man,
[14:43] if his, one of his goals was to get us to be scared, he failed. And, and let me just,
[14:48] let me make clear that you're right. All those folks were in the room and more. And yet we were all safe.
[14:54] Law enforcement did their jobs. And so president Trump said last night, and he means it,
[14:58] and I very much agree with him that this type of conduct will not deter him. It will not stop him
[15:03] from living. It will not stop him from doing his job. And, and that is not, not, not only him,
[15:08] but the vice president, the cabinet, the law enforcement, you all journalists,
[15:13] you're not going to stop doing your jobs either because of this, of this lone man that, that did what
[15:17] he did. And so this is a, this is something that, that we all are still reacting to because it's,
[15:24] it's fresh. But I assure you that the types of things that you saw last night and the president
[15:29] being out there and available to the American public that will not change because of what this guy
[15:34] tried to do last night. Well, there has been reporting over the past few months that due to this
[15:39] increased threat environment, both on the domestic front, but also because of the war in Gaza,
[15:43] because of the war in Iran, that there is an intensity to this moment and that there had
[15:50] been an effort to not allow the vice president and president to be together because of the risk.
[15:56] Why was that different? Vice president and president are together almost every day.
[16:00] I mean, they're, they're together constantly. So that's false reporting?
[16:03] Security. That's well, I see them together all the time. They were certainly together last night. And so,
[16:08] look, I'm not, I'm not minimizing the, the threats that, that president Trump and the vice
[16:13] president and that all the cabinet face every day for the reasons that you just described,
[16:17] domestically, Iran, internationally. And that is why we have a robust law enforcement keeping us
[16:23] safe and doing their jobs. It allows the vice president and president to do the work they need
[16:28] to do. It allows the secretary of state to do the work that he needs to do. And so,
[16:31] on the one hand, we take those threats very seriously, always have, and we always will. On the other hand,
[16:38] we do not, the, the way we respond to those threats is not to go into a bunker and hide.
[16:43] It's to trust the law enforcement that are, that are keeping us safe. And, and that's what happened
[16:47] last night. And that's what I think we'll, we will continue to see going forward.
[16:51] So, um, as I understand it, there was one injured secret service agent,
[16:56] but as the president said, he was wearing a bulletproof vest. Um, can you tell us if he's been
[17:01] released from the hospital? And to be clear, there were, there was gunfire happening. We believe
[17:09] from our reporting that the shooter did get off some rounds. Was it the alleged shooter or alleged
[17:16] assailant here who shot the secret service agent? That, that's what we, that's what we understand as
[17:23] of now. And, and the president spoke with him last night. He was in great spirits. He apparently didn't
[17:28] really even want to go to the hospital, although he was, he was certainly injured and it was the
[17:32] right thing as far as whether he's been released. I, I don't want to get into his, you know, his
[17:36] medical situation. That's not fair to him, but enough to say that, that we all heard his voice
[17:41] last night. The president gave him words of encouragement and appreciation and thanking him
[17:46] for the work that he's doing for, for all of us. And, and I will tell you, he was in very good spirits.
[17:52] And so that's a, a tragedy avoided. And it is because he was wearing a, a bulletproof vest.
[17:58] Um, I have to let you go, but writ large, is there thought of increasing the country's security
[18:04] posture after last night? We have every single day we're focused on our security. And so I promise
[18:10] you that, that the work that we were doing yesterday will continue today. And if there's
[18:15] things that we need to adjust, we will. But last night was of all the bad things that happened last
[18:19] night. And there were a lot, it was a tragic evening. It was also a success story when it
[18:24] comes to the secret service and FBI and law enforcement of which we're, we're very grateful.
[18:29] All right, Todd Blanche, thank you for your insights. And we'll be tracking the investigation
[18:34] as it develops. Face the Nation will be back in a minute. Stay with us.
[18:41] We're joined now by our senior White House correspondent, Weijia Zhang, who's currently
[18:44] serving as the president of the White House Correspondents Association. Weijia,
[18:49] thank you. It's been a very intense last few hours. You had just welcomed everyone. You had just
[18:56] started off the evening when this event unfolded. I've seen video now of you, you crawling off of
[19:03] the stage as the president was being whisked to safety. What was going on back there? Why didn't
[19:09] the president leave? Margaret, it all happened so fast. And when we were still on stage,
[19:16] we were in the middle of a very light moment with the entertainer who was doing a trick. And when
[19:24] I heard something in the audience, I thought it was a protester or something we're very used to. But
[19:30] then when I saw SWAT team members come to the head table and rush us to the ground and say,
[19:37] down, down, down, we were crawling off the stage. And in the back, that is a holding area where people
[19:45] wait, including President Trump and distinguished guests to go onto the stage. And we were sitting
[19:52] there and I saw more than a dozen SWAT officers. There were members of the Secret Service milling
[19:59] about. There were members of the president's team. And as you can imagine, a lot of conflicting
[20:05] information because it had just unfolded. I will say it was remarkable to see that in action and to
[20:11] understand it was their quick work that protected all of us that night, not just the president,
[20:17] not just the cabinet, everybody in that hotel. And, you know, that is heartening. But obviously,
[20:26] it was a tough situation for everybody that was there, including you.
[20:31] You were very stoic, though. You had great grace under pressure. You had to go out. You had to talk to
[20:37] everyone. And I know you shared that because you were in this role of the presidency, this was a
[20:43] proud moment for you. Your seven-year-old daughter was there. Your parents were there. Your husband was
[20:49] there. This was a lot. And I wonder what you think about this and why it was so important for all of
[20:59] us to be gathered. How are you making sense? Have you? I think we're processing this still.
[21:04] I think we're all processing it. I have covered countless shootings and murders and terrible things
[21:12] in my career. And this is the first time that I've been on the other side of a potentially violent and
[21:21] deadly situation. And no amount of reporting can prepare you for that. You're right that my family
[21:28] was in the audience. And it was incredibly meaningful to have them there. And so that added an additional
[21:36] complicated layer because I'm thinking about the safety of my members, the safety of all of our
[21:42] dinner guests, and obviously at the forefront, the safety of the people who I can see who matter the
[21:48] most to me. And we didn't have information. So when I was in the back, I didn't know if there was an
[21:55] active threat. I was watching the monitors and keeping my eyes right on their table. But at the same
[22:02] time, trying to find more information so I could share it with everyone in that room. And President
[22:10] Trump called me to his holding room and briefed me before he sent out a post about the dinner being,
[22:18] in his words, postponed and that he was going to have a press conference. And he really wanted to
[22:24] talk it through and to explain that he himself realized how important that night was.
[22:32] It's something we do every night. And when I did address the room, I reminded everyone that,
[22:38] you know, the freedoms that we are celebrating tonight in the First Amendment are still incredibly
[22:44] fragile. And I appreciate that the president acknowledged that. And he told me that we were not
[22:52] going to be deterred. He refused to stand down. And that's why he was there, despite what had
[22:59] unfolded. And I don't know what his team was telling him. They were relaying to me,
[23:03] the president keeps saying he's not going anywhere. So that's why he stayed.
[23:09] No, we kept hearing that with the, he wants to come back and can we leave?
[23:12] We, I want, I want you to go home to your family. Thank you. Thank you very much for sharing with
[23:20] us. We'll be right back. We turn now to Samantha Vinograt. She was a top homeland security official
[23:32] in the Biden administration, is now a national security contributor here at CBS. And AT Smith
[23:37] is a former deputy director of the Secret Service and now a CBS law enforcement analyst and joins us from
[23:43] Greenville, South Carolina. Good to have you both here. Sam, you were in the room with us,
[23:50] sheltering with some of our colleagues. As I understand it, you were close to the perimeter
[23:56] and able to detect some of what was happening. I was struck. National Guard was there. Secret
[24:02] Service was there. Private security was there. National Guard was there. The perimeter of the
[24:07] security went out pretty darn far. There were protests surrounding the building. There weren't
[24:12] just protests about Trump. There were protests around Jeffrey Epstein. There were protests about the
[24:16] corporation that owns this news network. There were protests about the Iran war. How did you assess the
[24:25] security situation last night? Well, Margaret, I think a lot of us are waking up this morning and asking
[24:30] the basic question of, is anywhere safe? And the reality is that in this country, we are facing the most
[24:36] complex threat environment in our nation's history, in particular from lone actors, individuals who
[24:41] radicalize to violence, often online. In this scenario, two things can be true. It can be true
[24:48] that law enforcement and intelligence professionals prepared exhaustively for last night. Weeks of
[24:54] planning, intelligence gathering, physical security barriers, officers on site. But it can also be true
[25:01] that in this moment, in this security environment, the paradigms of the past may not be sufficient to
[25:07] meet the moment. And with that in mind, security professionals, as well as private citizens, need to
[25:12] rethink what it is going to take to actually secure these mass gatherings where there are so many
[25:18] protectees and what it's going to take to secure communities. It's frightening. I mean, AT, we're in a room
[25:25] with the most heavily guarded man in the world. And yet this happened. The acting attorney general said
[25:35] the system worked. In your view, did the system work? The system did work in terms of what the Secret
[25:42] Service trains to do every day when it comes to covering and evacuating a protectee. And as you saw,
[25:47] the security plan there had the scenario where the president and the vice president exited different
[25:54] ways. They exited in different ways than the normal folks had come into the gathering. Having said that,
[26:03] the Secret Service, as I've said many times, no one is more critical of themselves than the Secret
[26:09] Service. So they're going to have to look at this very diligently in terms of this individual, how he was
[26:16] able to run that magnetometer as he did and get as close as he did with two firearms. That is not acceptable,
[26:23] and they will have to try to figure that part out and see what the intelligence and the investigation
[26:31] is going to bring in terms of what this individual's history was. And then, as you said earlier, Margaret,
[26:37] try to figure out exactly how he got those guns into the hotel. Did he avoid, as you said, taking
[26:45] an airplane to get there and by using a train and so forth, was able to secrete them in some way and get
[26:51] them there. So it's a tough thing. The Secret Service was very successful in how they did that.
[26:57] And as Sam said, the perimeter around the hotel was exhaustive. But again, anytime you have
[27:06] a breach like this, you've just got to address it and be your worst, you know, critic.
[27:10] You know, A.T., I was speaking with some of our producers before the program. Many of us have traveled
[27:16] with the president in the past and past presidents and other high-level officials. When the president
[27:21] goes overseas or the vice president, they typically take over an entire hotel. Secret Service really
[27:26] locks the place down. That didn't happen last night here on U.S. soil. Is that the kind of thing
[27:31] we're going to start seeing that it'll be more sort of like an Israeli model?
[27:34] You may have to. Particularly, you know, it's difficult because you have obviously a hotel
[27:42] that's open to the public. They have other guests that are unassociated with the event last night.
[27:47] And they are going to have to take a hard look at how you maybe screen those guests coming in. It's
[27:53] very hard to necessarily know everything about everybody that's there. But probably one safety
[27:59] scenario would be what you just said, to more or less lock down the hotel.
[28:03] Mm-hmm. We don't normally do that in the United States. And usually, the Secret Service is very
[28:09] successful at coordinating and sort of corralling that area, like the ballroom that's, you know,
[28:16] going to be used for the event and making it secure. But again, they'll have to take a look at that.
[28:20] And I said also that, you know, this was not a national special security event, but the planning,
[28:27] preparation, the weeks of work really align it to that kind of a security plan. So I'm sure
[28:34] in terms of parameters, that was all done. Sam, I think you make such a great point,
[28:40] which is essentially you can't protect against the unexpected, right? You can't protect against
[28:46] everything. We've talked about this, though. I mean, as parents, as human beings and being in that room,
[28:54] so many of those lawmakers, so many of those journalists are dehumanized. They are attacked
[29:00] online. They are attacking each other. You have a high level of animosity in the public space. People
[29:08] were united, and the president said, he wasn't wrong in using that word, because they were all scared
[29:15] of what was going to happen next. I don't know how we solve for that as a society, because it seems to
[29:23] have really seeped in to our politics and to our conversations. I mean, it is just the new normal.
[29:33] Every time an incident like this happens, the optimist in me thinks perhaps this will be a
[29:38] turning point. Perhaps this will be a turning point where each and every person in this country
[29:43] thinks about what they say and how they act. Words do matter, certainly. At the same time,
[29:48] whenever an incident like this happens, and I say this, Margaret, as a mother and as a security
[29:53] professional, I hope that it is also a wake-up call to law enforcement professionals to rethink
[29:58] whether additional steps are needed, like perhaps screening guests coming into a public venue at a
[30:03] mass gathering with a lot of protectees, but that it is also a wake-up call to every person in this
[30:09] country to understand that they have a role to play in our homeland security. While law enforcement
[30:14] looks at whether additional protocols are needed at various sites, every viewer, every person in this
[30:19] country needs to say something when they see something. An individual in their circle, at their
[30:25] workplace, in their family, is demonstrating signs that they could be going down a pathway to violence.
[30:30] They need to ask for help from a law enforcement professional or other trained official. And we
[30:34] need to really devote all the resources that we can to ensuring that the integration between state
[30:40] and local and federal officials is not just where it was before, but tighter than ever, so that we can
[30:46] try to prevent these incidents from happening in the future. Sam, I'm glad you're safe. I'm glad you're
[30:51] with us. AT, thank you very much for your insights. We'll be right back. And we're back now with Maryland
[31:01] Democratic Congressman Jamie Raskin. Congressman, you were there last night. Yes, indeed. One of the
[31:07] guests in the ballroom. Unfortunately, this is not your first encounter with political violence
[31:13] for many people in that room. The president, Steve Scalise, who survived a shooting himself, Charlie
[31:19] Kirk's widow was there. Um, RFK Jr., as we mentioned, and you were at that Capitol on January the 6th,
[31:27] sheltering in fear for your life at that period of time. How did that influence what happened last
[31:33] night? What did you do? So, um, I just entered the room and I was talking to some reporters who
[31:40] approached me from the Boston Globe. Their table was right near the perimeter as I was entering the
[31:45] ballroom. Uh, Kerry Kennedy was their guest and we were in conversation when there were three loud booms,
[31:53] uh, heard some screams, plates, glasses, silverware hitting the ground. And then everybody was yelling,
[32:00] get down. Somebody kind of pushed me from the back and, uh, we all ended up on the floor. Uh, when it was
[32:07] over, Kerry, who of course lost, uh, her father to, uh, uh, an assassin gunman and her uncle, uh, President Kennedy,
[32:17] um, she said, I, I can't believe that school children are dealing with this all across America,
[32:26] um, and don't have the resources to process their trauma. And, um, so that launched a conversation,
[32:34] uh, about gun violence and how, you know, somewhere between 275 and 300 people are shot every day
[32:42] in our country. And we lose more than a hundred of them every day. So even as this nightmare was
[32:47] unfolding at the White House Correspondents' Dinner, dozens and dozens of people had been
[32:53] shot and killed in our country. And so I hope this isn't just a inside the beltway story. I hope we talk
[33:00] about the conditions for school children and people all over the country who are dealing with this.
[33:06] No, it's a, it's a good point. We had, we benefited from all that security.
[33:11] That's right. Those children across the country don't have a sliver of it.
[33:14] Well, that's right. And, and, and, you know, I heard, uh, President Trump talk about this
[33:19] demonstrating the importance of the new ballroom. And he sent out some messages about the ballroom,
[33:24] and that might help people who are visiting the White House. But what about people who are in shopping
[33:29] malls and movie theaters and high schools and elementary schools across the country?
[33:33] So I hope we can have a serious bipartisan national conversation about what we can do
[33:39] to improve public safety for everybody. Well, to that point, I mean, we're in the 10th
[33:44] week of a partial shutdown of Homeland Security, um, which, by the way, Secret Service falls under
[33:50] the umbrella of Homeland Security. So do many essential workers. This has been just tangled up
[33:56] in this policy standoff in Congress. Do you think things change after last night?
[34:00] Yes. I certainly hope so. I mean, we, you know,
[34:04] of course, we, we had, um, a unanimous vote out of the Senate, all the Republicans,
[34:08] all the Democrats, and then all the Democrats in the House vote to restore all of the funding,
[34:13] except for ICE. And of course, it was about ICE killing innocent people in Minneapolis,
[34:18] Alex Preddy and Renee Goode, that led to this standoff over this. So I hope we can improve
[34:24] public safety for everybody. But it was in the House and Republican leadership wasn't willing
[34:28] to do that. But do you think it, it changes now that Democrats and Republicans will say,
[34:33] let's fund everything fully? Yeah. Again, we've got three quarters of
[34:36] Congress all together, uh, on moving forward, resolving the remaining issues and getting
[34:42] everything funded. Fortunately, uh, you know, there's no interruption in any of ICE's funding because
[34:49] it was so super hyperfunded originally. So that's why, uh, it's kind of a made up controversy because
[34:56] they have the money that they need. Uh, but we still have to deal with the underlying issues
[35:01] that led to this in the first place. Um, it was the Democrats position to, to hold that up.
[35:06] Um, to hold up, uh, to make the argument over changes policy-wise to ICE and CBP.
[35:12] Well, right. After the killings in Minneapolis. Yes, absolutely.
[35:15] The vast majority of American people agree. Well, no, no, what's made up is the idea that
[35:19] ICE somehow isn't getting its money. Got it. It's been getting, I mean,
[35:22] it's got the money for a long time because of the original, you know, big, beautiful bill.
[35:27] The president, um, I want to make sure that I recognize what he said because we don't hear
[35:32] him speak this way very often. He said,
[35:35] I asked all Americans to recommit with their hearts to resolve our difference peacefully.
[35:41] And he talked about being unified with members of the press. Yes. Um,
[35:48] Well, that certainly, that's a new message from him. That's great. He had called the press,
[35:51] of course, the enemy of the people. And he's been engaged in a lot of lawsuits against your profession.
[35:56] Well, well, yes. Um, we are going into this politically charged midterm season.
[36:02] There's going to be campaigning around the country with lawmakers out there. I mean,
[36:05] does something change? Yes. He said this. Does something change?
[36:09] Does democratic language need to change as well? Well, we have said all along that we need every
[36:16] politician in the country, every leader in the country, every citizen in the country,
[36:20] denouncing political violence across the board, um, regardless of where it's coming from.
[36:25] Yeah. Um, so, uh, you know, I find this a welcome change in rhetoric. But, you know,
[36:32] what happened last week, they brought a lawsuit against the Southern Poverty Law Center,
[36:36] whose whole purpose is to work, is to investigate violent right-wing extremism in the country.
[36:43] And now they're prosecuting them for having used undercover agents, which, of course,
[36:47] the FBI uses and the government uses all the time. Well, understood. Um, and there,
[36:52] there is across party lines, some, some political violence, way too much of it right now. And actually,
[36:56] Speaker Emerita Pelosi on this program said to me recently that she thought the threat or the
[37:02] concern about violence or threats to your family is what is hurting recruitment of people to run
[37:08] for office, particularly mothers, particularly women. Are you seeing that, that people are afraid
[37:13] to even join public life because of this? Sure. Anybody who's thinking about running for office
[37:20] undoubtedly thinks about that. Anybody who's thinking about running for president undoubtedly
[37:24] thinks about that. And those people have the most protection with the Secret Service and other
[37:30] people don't have the same kind of protection. So, look, we've got to rediscover the great American
[37:37] tradition of nonviolence and Dr. King and the civilizing movements that have always opposed violence
[37:44] versus the violent groups that have used violence historically, beginning with the Ku Klux Klan,
[37:50] in order to terrorize other people. Congressman Raskin, thank you for joining us. And we're glad
[37:55] you were able to do so. We'll be right back. We turn now to the British ambassador to the United States,
[38:04] His Excellency Sir Christian Turner. Good to have you here. Good to be here, Margaret. Thank you.
[38:09] You too were in that ballroom last night. You've had a lot of security training for unstable countries
[38:15] where you have been posted as a professional diplomat over the course of your career. Did you ever
[38:20] imagine in one of the most heavily guarded rooms in D.C. you'd have to put that to use? Well,
[38:24] at the training I've had in some of those places I've been actually kicks in last night. You basically
[38:28] do what you're told and let the professional security folk do what they do. And I think it
[38:32] was one of my big takeaways last night. I think it was, I'm with the people who say it was a success
[38:38] story. The Secret Service absolutely did what they needed to. Not only that, but seeing actually all the
[38:45] journalists in the room and their training kicking in, in a weekend that is all about the freedom of the
[38:49] press, I'm full of admiration for the way people responded last night. Well, you, me too, but you
[38:58] have a week ahead of you because King Charles and Queen Camilla are expected to arrive tomorrow.
[39:04] This is a going to be a big event regardless of what happened last night. But just to be clear,
[39:09] you haven't changed your security assessment. You believe it is still safe for them to come and
[39:14] speak to Congress and be at the White House. So we respond to that professional advice.
[39:19] I'm currently planning to be welcoming their Majesties tomorrow. But of course, our team's
[39:25] been in touch way through the night and we'll be through the day to see whether the events of last
[39:28] night have any change in our operational planning. And I'm very confident that their Majesties will
[39:34] have the very best security throughout the visit. All right, because there is another big
[39:38] ballroom gathering planned, right? For the King. It's going to be an extraordinary three or four days for us,
[39:44] Margaret. We've been planning this visit for years, really. It's the 250th between our two
[39:50] countries. I mean, a somber background after last night for all of us. But I still hope we'll be able
[39:56] to showcase this moment and make it the celebration that it deserves to be.
[40:00] Well, a celebration, but to be clear, it's also a bit of repair work, right, to the special
[40:06] relationship. The president had been quite upset with your prime minister, Keir Starmer,
[40:12] who didn't initially support the offensive operations by the U.S. and Israel against Iran.
[40:19] And the president was very clear he was not happy with him. He mocked him. He said,
[40:24] he's no Winston Churchill. He said it was too late for the U.K. to even offer help. And then there was
[40:29] other tension about the U.K. as a NATO ally. How much repair work is this visit actually about?
[40:37] Well, the extraordinary thing in the British constitution, of course, is the king is above
[40:42] politics. I have to remind people he's never given... He is a definite political asset. Let's be clear.
[40:47] But he's never given an interview, which I have to remind people, because, of course,
[40:50] he's the head of state, but he's not the head of government. So, actually, that's why we can make
[40:55] this a moment to step up and step back. And I think, I mean, just to take it back to last night,
[41:00] I mean, the other takeaway is that strong sentiment you were just discussing with your last guest,
[41:03] the president calling for us to resolve our differences peacefully, that there is no place
[41:08] for political violence in any of our democracies. You know, these are enduring messages. They're
[41:13] baked into our political makeup, into your political makeup. That ability for us to look back,
[41:20] we had a small difference of opinion in 1776. We've been through that. We've come a very long way.
[41:26] And that, in a way, for me, is what is so enduring about this relationship. It's that we've had
[41:30] differences. Thatcher to Reagan, Roosevelt, with Churchill, actually, over how to handle Stalin.
[41:38] These are moments in the relationship, but actually it endures because it is so deep
[41:42] on security. Yes, NATO, on our investment. We are the largest investor in 21 states,
[41:50] 430 billion dollars of trade. I mean, the statistics come out, but it's actually about the people
[41:56] that we want this to focus. So I am, I'm very confident that's where we will want to focus
[42:01] our time this week. And I should add, the prime minister spoke to the president this morning
[42:06] after the incident. The king sent a personal message to the president and first lady. So,
[42:11] actually, in diplomacy, it's as much personal as it is political.
[42:14] Well, on the diplomatic front, the UK has been convening European countries to try to figure
[42:21] out what to do with the Strait of Hormuz after combat ends. You know the Iran file quite well.
[42:27] You were previously a negotiator here. What's your assessment on who is running Iran right now and
[42:34] whether we see an end to this conflict anytime soon? So, it's difficult in, in Tehran. There are
[42:41] clearly some divisions. You pointed to that initial disagreement before the war.
[42:47] But since then, Margaret, actually, the UK has been doing a lot. We were using our bases for
[42:52] defensive strikes. We've flown something like 2,000 sorties with aircraft in the Middle East,
[42:57] shooting down drones and missiles to protect our allies every night in very close coordination with
[43:02] the US. And of course, our intelligence base, we don't talk about it much, but it's the absolute
[43:07] foundation of so much that is going on. We share the same intent, the same policy as the US. We want
[43:16] to constrain this regime and its threat. We want the straits open again. So, this coalition you refer
[43:22] to that President Macron has worked with my Prime Minister Keir Starmer on, what we want that to do,
[43:28] something like 50 countries coming together to work out... Secretary Hexer called it silly.
[43:32] He said it was just a bunch of meetings. What are you going to plan to do?
[43:37] It is planning, once the straits are open, to ensure that the navigation we need has got the
[43:43] assurance of a whole package of boats, of drones, of intelligence, to be able to make sure that
[43:50] shipping goes through. Because that's what American citizens need, that's what British citizens need,
[43:54] the people of Asia need. The global economy is suffering, and we want to see that result.
[43:58] It is indeed. Thank you, Ambassador. Good luck this week. We'll be right back.
[44:06] A night to celebrate the First Amendment, abruptly ended by a gunman,
[44:11] permitted by the Second Amendment to own those weapons. Gun violence is not new in America,
[44:18] but the threat of violence is now a cost of public life. It permeates our politics. Last month,
[44:25] Supreme Court Justice Roberts publicly appealed for personal attacks on judges to stop.
[44:31] U.S. Marshals report there were 564 threats last year, and nearly 15,000 against lawmakers, staff,
[44:40] and their families, according to U.S. Capitol Police. Multiple Trump cabinet members now live
[44:46] on military bases for their own protection. No such fortress for the federal and state officials who face
[44:53] growing number of threats in communities across the country. There's a marked increase in harassment and
[44:59] threats of physical violence to journalists in the U.S. from the very public they are working to inform.
[45:06] As the nation wonders how to keep the next gunman out, let's also reflect on how we let this hate in,
[45:15] how we stop it from corroding our democracy and grasp onto our civility before we lose it.
[45:22] That's it for us today. Stay tuned to CBS News 24-7 for all the latest on this story,
[45:29] and be sure to tune in to the evening news tonight Tony DiCoppo will anchor from the White House.
[45:34] Due to breaking news today, we will air our interview with Chevron Chairman and CEO Mike Wirth
[45:39] next Sunday. Thank you to all my colleagues at CBS. I'm Margaret Brennan.
Transcribe Any Video or Podcast — Free
Paste a URL and get a full AI-powered transcript in minutes. Try ScribeHawk →