opportunity to let us know. During this meeting, please put all cell phones and other communication devices on vibrate. The cases will be called today in the order listed on the agenda unless there is a request for a case to be taken out of turn. These cases are quasi-judicial, which means that they require due process, and the decisions are to be based on competent, substantial evidence presented during the hearings. County staff will present the county's review and recommendation on the case first, and then the applicant will have an opportunity to present any additional information they would like to provide. After the applicant has concluded their presentation, I will open the hearing up for public comment. This is the public's opportunity to provide information and express their opinions on the application. If you have any questions that come up during the presentation, you can ask them during your time to speak. Please do not ask questions or make comments from the audience while others are speaking at the podium. The county, the applicant, and I will note questions you raise during your comments and try to have them answered following the close of public comment. When it is your turn to speak, either for your case or during public comment, please state your name and address for the record into the microphone. These proceedings are recorded, and it is important that you speak into the microphone to ensure an accurate recording. After public comment closes, the applicant and the county will be given the opportunity to answer any questions or to reply to comments that may have come up during public comment. They will also be able to make any concluding statements that they may have. The hearing will close for each case following the concluding statements of the parties. My decision will not be given today, but it will be provided in a written final order within 14 days of today. Again, if you would like a copy of my decision, please fill out the form on the back table and provide it to our clerk. For the record, I want to note that I have received no ex parte communications. That means that nobody has contacted me about these cases outside of today's hearing. If anyone should need an interpreter, please let the clerk know and the county will try to arrange one for you. All testimony today must be given under oath, so I will now ask our clerk to swear in all speakers. If you're going to address the land use hearing officer on any case today, please stand, raise your right hand, and answer out loud to the following question. Do you swear or affirm the testimony you provide today is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth? Thank you. Okay, the first item on our agenda is approval of the minutes from the December 14th, 2023 land use hearing officer meeting. We can show those as accepted, and that now takes us to, I guess, first the item that's going to be continued. Yes, LDLVAR-2023-65, the LE variance, is requesting to be continued to April 25th, 2024. Okay, we will make note of that, and that will then be put on the agenda for that meeting. And so now we move into new business, and the first item there is LDLSE 2023-10. Our first case is LDLSE-2023-10, the Old Dade City Road special exception. The applicant is requesting a special exception to park a commercial vehicle on residential property. For the purposes of notification, 13 mailers were sent on January 9th, 2024. One board was posted on January 9th, 2024, and a legal ad was published in the Lakeland Ledger on January 12th, 2024. Staff has received no response, and Melissa Celestine is the case planner. Good afternoon. For the record, Melissa Celestine presenting LDLSE-2023-10. Staff is recommending approval of the applicant's request to park one commercial vehicle on residential property located north of Lakeland. The subject property is west of U.S. 98 North and north of West Circumloop Road. The site is within an agriculture residential interrural land use district where minimum lot size is of five acres. The property is a vested lot identified as lot four of block four in the Lakeland Acres subdivision. The parcel is 4.92 acres with a single family residence in which the owner of the vehicle purchased in May of 2021 and currently resides. If the parcel were five acres or if the owner could park the vehicle within a fully enclosed structure, a special exception would not be required. As you can see here, the area is extremely rural in nature. Although the aerial shows potential routes in the immediate vicinity of the subject site with a more direct path to U.S. 98, these routes prohibit truck traffic. Although the vehicle will pass numerous rooftops, the vehicle will remain on Old Date City Road, which commercial vehicles typically utilizes. Old Date City Road segments connects West Circumloop Road in Lakeland to U.S. 98 North, near Pasco County. Depending on which route the driver takes, they will travel between five miles and seven miles to access U.S. 98 North. The applicant can also take Circumloop Road West to Kathleen Road to access the interstate. Here is an overview of the request. It is for a 2005 Peterbilt semi truck with trailer to be parked at the west side of the residence. With the trailer, the vehicle is approximately 13.5 feet in height and 64 feet in length. According to the submitted site plan, the vehicle will exceed the 20-foot setback requirement outlined in Chapter 2, Section 216D. The nearest off-site structure is within 200 feet to the west of the proposed parking area. Therefore, the proposed parking area shall meet the buffering requirement and or the minimum six-foot fence requirements outlined in Section 216D of the Land Development Code. Here is the updated registration of the proposed commercial vehicle, a 2005 Peterbilt semi truck included for the record. The original truck was a 2017 Volvo semi truck. Here is a submitted site plan showing the proposed parking location of the vehicle. You can see how the applicant exceeds the 20-foot setback requirement from the property boundaries. Here is a site visit photo showing the estimate location of the parking area according to the submitted site plan. You can see the current driveway condition right over here. The applicant will be required to construct the commercial driveway in accordance with Chapter 7, Section 705I of the Land Development Code as shown here on the right. Staff recommends approval. The vehicle will be parked on the same lot occupied by the owner. The request meets the 50-foot, I'm sorry, meets the 20-foot setback requirement from all property lines. As previously mentioned, the site falls short of the exemption by 0.08 acres. Likewise, if the vehicle could fit into a fully enclosed structure, a special exception would not be necessary. With that, I thank you and I'll stand for questions. Could you go back to the aerial that showed the travel path that they would have to take and maybe go through that again but a little more slower? Lower? Okay, so this is where the house is approximately. They can either go north up here, this is Pasco County, to access U.S. 98 north. An alternate route would be going down to Circle Loop West to hit U.S. 98, and then they can continue down to the interstate, or they can go west to go ahead to Kathleen Road to the interstate. So there's just multiple avenues that they can get to access the interstate. Okay, and that's all to stay on? Old Dade City Road right here. And how is Old Dade City Road classified? It's an urban collector road. So what you're showing me here is how they could get to I-4 by staying on urban collector roads? Correct. Okay. And then again, the aerial, I'm sorry, not the aerial, the photograph that showed from the ground view where the parking location would be, that one. Okay. And it'll have to be buffered from the front as well? No. Just minimized from the front. Okay. I thought there was a requirement that you had that they had to minimize view of the vehicle from the right-of-way? No. From the neighboring properties? They have to minimize the, if it's parked, it can't be parked sideways. It has to be parked straight in. That's what I'm thinking of. Yes. There's no buffer requirement for there. Gotcha. So it could be the front or the back, but not the side. Correct. Okay. That's what I'm thinking of. Okay. Is the applicant present? If you could come forward, please. Yeah. And then just start off by, I'm giving us your name and address, please. My name is Luis Alberto Alonso and my address is 11461 Old Dade City Road, Kathleen, Florida 3349. Okay. And again, you said Luis Alberto Alonso? Yes, ma'am. You are the owner of the vehicle? Yes, ma'am. Okay. Can you tell me how you use it? I go over the road and I come back every week or every other week and that's what pays my bills. Okay. You transport? I do. I used to do flatbed. Now I do drive-in, closing cargo. And so you're gone for a week or two at a time? Yeah. A week or two, except because the loads are, the mark is not too good right now. So if I have to work extra to be able to pay my truck expenses or my home expenses, then I stay longer. Okay. Is there anything else you would like to add in support of your application? No, ma'am. I agree with everything she said. Okay. Okay. Thank you. No, thank you. I will now open up this application for public comment. Is there anyone who came here today to speak to this application, either for or against? Seeing no one, we will close public comment. Anything else from staff? No, ma'am. Okay. Thank you. And next, we will go to LDL VAR 2023-59. Our next case is LDL VAR 2023-59, the Capri Drive variants. The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the primary structure rear setback from 10 feet to 7 feet for a lanai at the rear of the home. For purposes of notification, 61 mailers were sent January 9th, 2024. One board was posted on December 27th, 2023, and a legal ad was published in the Lakeland Ledger on January 12th, 2024. Staff has received no response and Aaliyah Inglema is the case planner. Good afternoon. Aaliyah Inglema with Land Development presenting LDL VAR 2023-59, the Capri Drive variants. The applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the primary structure rear setback from 10 feet to 7 feet for a lanai at the rear of the home. The subject site is located at 204 Capri Drive, Davenport, north of Terra Lago Street, east of Capri Drive, south of Calabria Avenue, and section 14, township 25, range 26. The property is located within a residential medium feature lane use within the PD-01-28, the north US-27 selected area plan, the green swamp area of critical state concern, ridge special protection area, and transit supportive development area. The subject property is lot 328 within the approved plan development Regal Palms at Highland Reserve. To the east of the subject property is a platted track intended as open space, which is tracked F. PD-01-28 did not establish rear yard setbacks to account for the reduced lot sizes and potential additions to be made by future homeowners. Setbacks within the north US-27 SAP are based upon compatibility with adjacent uses. Staff has followed the setbacks outlined in table 2.2 of the LDC, which require principal structures to be set back 10 feet from rear property lines within a residential medium land use. The original developer and home builder placed the structure in its current location and was not determined by the property owner. Without the variance, constructing a lanai to meet setbacks on the parcel would be difficult due to the lot being smaller than RM density. Tract F of Regal Palms is open space along with a pond, so the rear property does not face any other structures or homes. This lot also has no easements to the rear. Since 2021, seven variances have been approved in Regal Palms for a rear setback reduction. Staff finds that the variance, if approved, will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare of the neighborhood is that the structure will be set back seven feet from a platted open space which is tracked F owned by the HOA. And I'll stand for questions. Can you go back to the photo that you just showed? And is that the unit closest to us that we're looking at right there with the two chairs? Yes, yes. And the tree is not in the way of the proposed structure? I have to defer to the applicant with that but it may be. Okay, so what they're proposing to add on is an open lanai not not screened in it's just open with a they're just adding to what's there? That I will defer to the applicant and answer that. Okay, well then is the applicant present? Okay, great. If I could just ask that when you speak you speak into the microphone so that it gets caught up on the picked up on the recording. Thank you. Yeah. And if you could also give us your address please. 204 Capri Drive in Davenport. Okay. So let's start with what you're going to be building there. Is it going to be open or screened in? What is it you're proposing to add on? Great question. So if you look in the picture on the bottom right hand side it would be the same installer and manufacturer of the closed in one that you can kind of see mid. Yes, it's the exact same one as that with the same installer. Okay. That's kind of that's what's standard in the development. Okay, so it's going to be a screen room with a hard roof? Correct. Okay, and what about the tree? And the tree we did receive HOA approval to remove the tree. Do you have HOA approval for the structure or do you not need? We needed that to be able to apply for the variance first, so yes, they did approve for both. So one of the criteria that staff and I have to consider when evaluating a variance application is hardship, something that is unique to the property or situation that justifies deviating from the codes criterion. And could you elaborate on that requirement, please? Yes, absolutely. I feel that due to the fact that the other variances have been granted, that allows people to expand the living space of their property and increase the value and the aesthetic of the home. Obviously, a hugely popular thing in Florida is to have that outdoor indoor outdoor living space. So we do believe that it would be interest to us if we were not allowed to have the same thing that our neighbor down the road would have as well. Thank you, ma'am. When did you purchase the property? I believe it was June. It was June of 2023, I believe this closing was. And it's the two of you that live there? Or is it the others? Yeah. Okay. Anything else you would like to add in support of your application? Not unless you have further questions. I don't believe I do. Thank you. Thank you very much for your time. We'll now open up this application for public comment. Is there anyone who came here today to address this application to speak either for or against it? Seeing no one, we will close public comment. And is there anything else from staff? No, ma'am. Now go to LDL VAR 2023-60. Our next case is LDL VAR 2023-60, the Mount Olive Road variance. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow an accessory structure to be larger than the primary structure. For the purposes of notification, 19 mailers were sent on January 9th, 2024. One board was posted on December 15th, 2023. An illegal ad was published in the Lakeland Ledger on January 12th, 2024. Staff has received no response. Analia Anglima is the case planner. Good afternoon, Alia Anglima with Land Development presenting LDL VAR 2023-60, the Mount Olive Road variance. The applicant is requesting a variance to allow an accessory structure to be larger than the primary structure. The subject site is located at 5735 Mount Olive Road, west of De Rosa Road, east of Marker Road, south of I-4, Polk City, and Section 8, Township 27, Range 25. The location is within a residential low to future lane use, I-4 selected area plan, and the transit supportive development area. The subject parcel is 5.02 acres and surrounded by a cluster of lots ranging in size from an acre to five acres and it's sometimes larger. This lot is larger than the residential low to minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet. The primary structure is approximately 1,680 square feet total under roof and the metal building is around 3,750 square feet. This accessory structure has existed to the rear of the home for over 15 years. The owner purchased the property in December of 2015 according to the Polk County Property Appraiser. The applicant was cited by code enforcement for having an accessory structure larger than the primary structure. Code Enforcement Division staff investigated and discovered the metal building to the rear. The code enforcement special magistrate case is pending as the owner is seeking approval to allow the building on their property. The accessory structure has been on the property since 2007 before the applicant acquired the property. The previous owner did not secure a building permit for the structure but the new owners are now taking the steps to fix the problem. The current owners use the metal building for storage. If the property was located in an agriculture residential rural land use section 209g allows accessory structures administratively to be permitted up to 150 percent of the principal structure square footage or height if the parcel meets five acres. The request will not be interest to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare as the building is at the rear near the primary home within a fence boundary and will meet all setbacks. Special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to land structure or building involved as the accessory structure has been on the property since 2007 before the applicant acquired the property and I'll stand for questions. You said the property is fenced it's fenced all the way around the perimeter of the five acres? Yes ma'am. Okay I don't think I have other questions for you at the moment but is the applicant present? Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Natalie Albritton. My address is 1307 Keystone Point, Auburndale, Florida. Okay and you are here on behalf of all three owners I see? Correct. Myself and my sisters owned the property one thing that I can say we did not actually purchase the property we acquired the property through probate my mother owned the property with my stepfather previously they acquired that piece of property through they loaned some money to a gentleman he used that property as collateral he could not pay the loan back and so they acquired the property by default then when my mother and stepfather divorced she acquired the property through the divorce in 2015 that was in august of 2015 she passed away in december of 2015 so at that point the property was transferred to my sisters and i okay so you took title in august of 2015 but it had been in your family for a number of years before that we didn't actually acquire the property until it did not come into our name until after the probate was over which was um last 2022 i believe um but she passed away in 2020 15 um and so she acquired it in her name in august of 2015 um at the time of the divorce okay and i understand that the property is occupied by tenants at the moment correct okay and they use the building for storage yes ma'am they do do you have any idea what type of thing is stored in there uh yes ma'am it's um mostly tools and they do have i believe two vehicles in a golf cart you know so it's just used for storage typically when um an order is issued um approving a special exception or a variance there are a number of conditions of approval that are placed on the order and one of the conditions that staff has proposed in this instance is that there can be no home-based business or commercial enterprise operated out of the structure and i just wanted to make sure you understood that we completely understand that and agree with that okay and that's not unique to this one that's a standard edition that's great great we're not that's not even a condition that we're concerned about okay excellent is there any other um garage associated with no house or carport or any other accessory structure no ma'am it's just the mobile home okay so there is nowhere else to store anything or to park a vehicle or anything like that correct okay is there anything else you would like to add in support of your application no ma'am i believe we've addressed everything with the application and then with your uh staff's approval okay great thank you thank you and i will now open up this application for public comment is there anyone who came here today to speak to speak to this application either for or against seeing no one we will close public comment and move on to ldl var 2023-62 our next case is ldl var-2023-62 the highlands in the woods drive variance the applicant is requesting a variance to reduce the rear accessory structure setback from 10 feet to 5 feet for a screen enclosure for a pool and patio for the purposes of notification 22 mailers were sent january 9th 2024 one board was posted on january 8 2024 and a legal ad was published in the lakeland ledger on january 12 2024 staff has received no response and melissa celestine is the case planner good afternoon for the record melissa celestine presenting ldl var 2023-62 the applicant is requesting a rare accessory structure reduction from 10 feet to 5 feet for the construction of a screen enclosure in conjunction with a pool and patio the screen enclosure will be approximately 1780 feet according to the applicant staff recommends approval the subject site is south of 540a and east of south florida avenue the property is identified as lot 17 of block d within the howland preserve east subdivision the site is also located within the residential low one land use district associated with a plan development pd04-16 the pd is unique because each block throughout the development is associated with a specific lot size and setback requirements that were granted as part of the approved pd request however accessory structure setbacks were not identified in the approved pd for this lot typically staff could apply section 208e for infill or 208f for pool and screening closures if the pd did not have the binding condition highlighted in yellow while the pd does not specifically say accessory structure setbacks it says if not in the table land uses shall apply therefore the accessory structure setbacks are bound to the residential low one setback requirements in table 2.2 of the land development code which states accessory structures in the rl1 district are required to have a five foot setback from the interior side and 10 feet from the interior rare property lines here is a context view of the site's location which also identifies pools with screen enclosures throughout the neighborhood here is a close-up the primary residence was constructed in 2017 and the applicant acquired the property in october of 2019 so the rear of the home is tracked e identified on the plat as an area intended for drainage retention fence landscape and open space the proposed structure will also maintain a five foot rare setback from the property line according to the submitted site plan here is the submitted site plan per the applicant the proposed carport is going to be detached from the home so the request is solely for the screen enclosure which is estimated to be 67 feet wide so the right is a snippet of the plat showing tracked e details here are some site visit photos looking onto looking southeast onto the property and looking northwest onto the property here's a graphic provided by the applicant of what they would like to achieve staff recommends approval if staff were able to apply section 208 e or 208 f of the land development code a variance approval would not be necessary nevertheless the rear of the home is to the rear of the home is tracked e and the proposed structure will maintain a five foot setback from the property line so there will be adequate buffering for the proposed request and property maintenance with that i thank you and i'll stand for questions so tell me again about the the condition of the pd with without the condition of it that's what's in the yellow shaded area you would apply d or e which could apply either section 208 e for infill which would allow it to use a residential low three setbacks or the pooling screen enclosure setbacks which is the five foot okay from the code not from right from the code okay and so one of those is five feet and one of those is they're both essentially five feet okay gotcha okay but instead we have to use just the regular rear setback for an rl1 which is 10 feet exactly and you've made the point in your staff report that the lot size is more similar to an rl3 uh-huh which also has a five foot setback okay could you show the um site photographs again that show the rear yard yeah so it's gonna go further along here and then come all the way over this way and this one kind of shows where it's gonna start and then um could you put up the aerial that shows a little bit of the neighborhood or do you want the other one uh maybe if there's one that's shows a little bit more there we go i'm just looking to see the number of pools that are over there okay okay um is the applicant present could you come forward please good afternoon um jose molina and carolina lopez molina my wife we live at 1781 highlands in the woods drive lakeland florida 33813 okay um is there anything that you would like to add to what you have heard so far um in support of your application not really we we we would like to pursue getting the project done and that's it okay um one of the criteria that staff and i have to consider when evaluating um an application for a variance is hardship something that justifies deviating from the code's requirements could you address that uh please for your application yeah so the main idea of the patio and the pool that we're building is absolutely a lot pool which is uh intended besides the entertainment for for exercising so which is related to our health and as we are on on a niche like planning to towards our retirement that's part of the the intent to to do this uh now and so it will be related to to our health the the proposal that we're trying or intended to to build and that's why we need the the extended uh uh portion of the land for the be able and do it and yeah that will be part of the hardship that we consider i don't know if the pursuit of happiness is part of a hardship too but that would be part two okay well it was good enough for the declaration of independence so you know um the um the variance is for the screen or the pool it's going to be for the screen enclosure right not for the pool no not for the pool deck but for the screen enclosure taking that back we're going to put it for both it's for both the um oh yeah because the papers do go up to it so it'd be for the pavers and the screen i apologize okay so it's not just the screen enclosure that requires the variance it's even without the screen we would need the variance for the papers to be that close okay anything else you'd like to add no okay thank you thank you you know what i do have another question i'm sorry has your um hoa well i assume you're part of an hoa okay has the hoa approved this or do they not need to approve it yeah well they're preliminary approved definitely we need to go through this step before we develop the whole project we already present kind of a sketch of the idea the main idea they again preliminary approve uh the idea and they want to see a project after so they're good with the with the idea with the project subject to polk county approving everything yes for the for the position and because we haven't done the whole project until we we covered this step and and then we present the the entire project to them but the main concern is that the enclosure uh structure for the patio match the same color of the windows that's the biggest concern they have okay okay got it thank you thank you anything else from okay i think that takes us to our last case for today ldl var 2023-63 and our last case is ldl var-2023-63 the mary lee street variants good afternoon amy little with land development for the purposes of notification 26 mailers were sent january 9th 2024 two boards were posted on january 7th 2024 and a legal ad was published in the blakeland ledger on january 12th 2024 the request is for a right-of-way setback reduction from 35 feet to 24 feet for the construction of a single-family residence and staff is recommending approval the site is located on the corner of mary lee street and tangelo street southeast of the city of lake wales as this is a corner lot the construction of a primary structure is required to meet the right-of-way setbacks from both mary lee and tangelo the applicant indicates they wish to orient the house facing mary lee street and the proposed site plan meets the right-of-way setback from mary lee which is 20 feet from a local residential roadway tangelo however is a rural minor collector which requires a larger setback of 35 feet rural minor collectors are roadways that connect small communities in rural areas and generally have less than 1500 average daily trips tangelo has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour according to section 824 of the land development code roads with posted speeds less than 30 miles per hour require a 10 foot of clear recovery when there's no curb restriction so this request for the reduction exceeds that requirement staff has a little concern for the con for the reduction regarding public safety here's a photo standing on the corner of mary lee and tangelo the approximate lot lines are outlined in yellow the property line from tangelo has an additional 20 feet of grass shoulder so the placement of the home at 24 feet from the southern property line would result in the construction of the home being 44 feet from the edge of pavement staff feels that this is ample separation from the roadway here's a little view looking more north of the site all other setbacks will be met including the right-of-way setback from mary lee and the side and rear and staff is recommending approval the lot is one of the last that is developed on the street likely due to the restriction of the two right-of-way setback requirements the lots in the area are approximately 6 000 square feet so placement of structures are limited when tail while tangelo is a riot rural minor collector but because the posted speed limit is so slow there's little concern for public safety regarding the clear recovery zone and there will be approximately 44 feet of separation from the edge of pavement of tangelo which staff feels is more than adequate with that i thank you and i will stand for questions okay so there's approximately 20 feet of grass grass shoulder yes way okay um before between the property line and the pavement correct any concern with visibility triangle or no and and they meet that as well because they are set back 20 feet from the um mary lee's right of way so they meet the the 15 foot clear recovery triangle that we have and how does um the proposed setback line up with any other structures on tangelo so on tangelo let me see if i can get the aerial so these structures there's another one i'm a little bit further over these are approximately 25 feet from the property line so it will it will keep in line with the structures that are facing tangelo how wide is that lot i believe it's 60 feet wide yes okay and they're they're pushing it as far to the north as they can so they're keeping it the 10 foot side set back okay so the blue 35 foot that's what's required that's what's required the request is and and they're gonna they're actually going to be at 24 feet eight inches but we just round it down to the 24 just to keep it clean sure and so without that um the home could only be like 14 feet wide yes i believe mr williams can speak to it but his his company they have models that they have standard and this is i believe the the smallest that they offer to fit it onto the property and mr williams i'm sure will confirm that how does this lot size compare to other lots in the area they're all very similar in size you can see to the north these are all 6 000 square foot lots everything in this area is that similar size some of them are a little bit deeper the ones that face tangelo but to the north they're certainly the same lot size they just had to meet the right away from mary lee is only 20 feet so it's just because this is a minor collector that's causing that 35 foot requirement okay and you must be the applicant okay so my name is steve williams with saw properties uh p.o box 280 eagle lake florida 33839 you said saw properties s-a-w saw properties um is there anything you'd like to add in addition to what you've heard so far or to elaborate on any of the issues that have been discussed just when we bought the lot it was 60 feet wide and we're used to two front setbacks which would be 20 and 20 and after we bought it and submitted and we were very surprised the 35 foot on tangelo i know it's got a special classifications but there can't be 10 cars a day to go down that street there's no traffic at all back here so we we didn't buy it with the intention of thinking we were going to get a variance we thought 20 foot on tangelo was plenty and our house is 25 feet so we would have had extra five feet okay and that's a like a standard um house plan that you're it's actually smaller our normal house is 35 and you can't see the maps but if you if you go back just one lot um four there it's on the aerial map yeah just out of cul-de-sac 155 1554 the parcel behind it we built one of our standard houses there and then in that cul-de-sac you can't see the angle lot we have another one of our standard houses there as well so we built about five houses in this neighborhood in the past year and it would have taken our our standard house would have fit with a 20-foot setback of tangelo which was normal can you address the hardship requirement yes ma'am without the setback the lot's not buildable unless they approve a 14 foot wide mobile home anything else you'd like to add no ma'am thank you well i'm going to ask for public comment um since this is a public hearing but i don't see anyone in the room um so seeing no one we will close public comment um is there anything else from staff no ma'am okay and then i think that uh is the end of our meeting for today thank you