Civic › Pinellas County, FL › October 12, 2026

Code Enforcement Special Magistrate Hearing October 12, 2026 8:30 AM - Oct 12, 2026

Pinellas County, FL Board of County Commissioners October 12, 2026 102 minutes
▶ Watch original video Interactive viewer Search Pinellas County meetings

Transcript

Speaker0:07

good morning my name is jeff fuller i'm the special magistrate assigned to today's pinellas county code enforcement special magistrate agenda today's date is october 12 2026 welcome to pinellas county code enforcement special magistrate hearings the special magistrate is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether an alleged violation of the county code has occurred in order to meet that obligation all parties or their representatives will be allowed an opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violations all witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they provide is the truth the order of presentation will begin with the county presenting their evidence of the alleged violations and then the respondent shall present his or her case both parties shall have an opportunity to cross-examine all witnesses the special magistrate may question any witness the clerk will announce the names of the cases from the agenda when you hear your case called please respond by coming to the podium with your representative and or any witnesses to be sworn in we do not call the names necessarily uh in the cases in the same order that's on the agenda so listen when the cases are being called when addressed in the special magistrate please speak clearly into the microphone any person who decides to appeal the decision of the code enforcement special magistrate with respect to any matter consider that this hearing will need a record of the proceedings and for such purposes may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based the record is not provided by pinellas county would you please read item number 10 item 10 department code enforcement matter minimum housing short-term rentals 22-319 g1 22-319 i12 case number ccm-26-00127 officer d devall owner osagenosa jeremy yam zach zan yang notice address osagenosa jeremy yam zach zan yang 909 tilton avenue san mateo california 94401-1933 violation address 328 crosswinds drive palm harbor florida 34683 thank you who's who's appearing for the county officer devall and who's appearing on behalf of the respondents sanford kenny right it's my understanding that uh the parties have uh reached a joint stipulation i have reviewed the joint stipulation i am going to approve the stipulation and i will sign the order right thank you thank you magistrate thank you would you please read item number five item five department code enforcement matter lien reduction case number ccm-22-00023 owner 7025 harmony llc 13801 vermont avenue llc notice address david slotolo manager of 7025 harmony llc ceo james a schmidt 2904 west beta bay boulevard tampa florida 33629 paralegal at schmidtlawoffice.com violation address 35801 us highway 19 north palm harbor florida 34684 who was here for that case i'm here on behalf of the owner james schmidt is my understanding that the county made an offer for a lien reduction reduction of fines and it's my understanding that uh that has been agreed to and stipulated to is that correct that is correct i will go ahead and sign the order granting the joint motion for reduction of fines thank you thank you we'll be in adjournment for five minutes would you please read item number one item one rescheduled from september 21st 2026 rescheduled to november 16th 2026 department code enforcement matter 138-90 and 154-231 zoning code violations case number ccm-26-00068 officer b hughes owner clearview oaks management condo association inc 9887 4th street north suite 104 st petersburg florida 33702-2521 violation address 40th avenue north kenneth city florida 33709 and parcel id 04-31-16-16110-000-0001 all right it's my understanding that this case has been rescheduled to november 16th 2026 would you please read item number two item two department code enforcement matter 22-299 minimum housing code violation 58-270 interoperable vehicle code violation 58-304 trish and debris code violation 138-3220 zoning code zoning code violation case number ccm-26-00117 officer b hughes owner slayton pearl estate notice address slayton pearl estate 5248 104 street north st petersburg florida 33708 violation address 5248 104 street south sorry street st petersburg florida 33708 who is here for that case who's here for the county officer the county officer hughes i don't see anyone in the hearing room that i don't recognize and know who they are um has anyone signed in for this case no magistrate have you got any uh voicemails or emails concerning this case no magistrate all right county may proceed do you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth i do uh so match state the property where the alleged violation exists is 5248 104th street north st petersburg florida 33708 located in unincorporated pinellas county the owner pearl slayton estate is not present and no one has contacted me before this hearing the violations have been in occurrence since honor before april 27th of 2026 i would like to enter the notice of hearing and composite exhibit a into evidence which includes the notice of violations pinellas county tax collector and property appraiser information the warranty deed and the violation photos hearing no objection exhibit a will be admitted into evidence would you like me to go through the exhibit page by page or go straight to the violation so the first document is the notice of hearing scheduled for today's date the next document is the notice of violation for minimum housing sent to the owner of record notice the violation for the inoperable vehicles notice the violation for trash and debris violation and lastly the zoning violation for the outdoor storage you've got the tax collector document showing the owner of record likewise pinellas county property appraiser showing the same information the warranty deed and then the violation photos the first ones are for the minimum housing where you have rotted paint or rotted wood chip peeling paint you have a awning that the cover had been blown off you have some broken windows or missing vents on the door window the next photos show there's interoperable vehicles on the property you have a truck with no tag likewise a trailer with no tag again you can see the no vehicle registration and no vehicle registration um the next photos show the trash and debris the trailer on the property is full of trash and debris the logs which are still there is still on the right of way you've got multiple trash bags and vegetative vegetative debris on the property uh you also have multiple tools buckets equipments um pilings um just all different kind of um materials that are being stored on the property in front of the door extension cords things of that nature so magistrate the property was re-inspected on october 1st of 2026 and the violations continue photos were taken on that date and i would like to submit them to you as composite exhibit b hearing no objection exhibit b will be admitted into evidence so there haven't really been any changes since the original photos you still had all the extension cords and everything um being stored out front and i'm sorry these are the minimum housing violations where you can still see the chip paint the awning with the roof that was basically blown off the window missing broken screens things of that nature the same vehicles are still on the property you've got the trailer without a tag and the truck without a tag again you have the trailer that's still full of debris and trash um the buckets the bags of trash more bags of trash the logs that are still there on the right of way and just a large amount of equipment um again that's being stored on the property and i've had no contact from anyone so magistrate the county is alaska asking for the allowance of 30 days to comply and have still found in violation to assign a daily fine amount of 100 per day for perk per violation for code sections 22 299 58-270 58-304 and 138-3220 and award the costs in the amount of 230 dollars all right i have not seen anyone enter the hearing room that wasn't there when we started wasn't here when we started um caroline have you heard anything as far as voicemail or emails no magistrate case all right when it's 30 days all right i'm going to find that there is a violation of code section 22-299 order that the property be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 15 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so will assess a fine in the amount of 100 per day i'm going to find that there is a violation of code section 58-270 order that the property be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 11 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so will assess a fine in the amount of 100 per day i'm going to find that there is a violation of code section 58-304 order the property be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 11 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so will assess fine in the amount of 100 per day and i'm going to find that there is a violation of code section 138-3220 order that the property be brought in compliance within 30 days which is november 11 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so will assess a fine in the amount of 100 per day i will also assess costs the amount of 230 dollars thank you majesty would you please read item number three item three department code enforcement matter short-term rental violation 2-2-2-319-g1-22-319-i2-22-319-i3 case number ccm-26-00085 officer b hughes owner inman justin notice address inman justin 305 dr martin luther king jr street apartment 1311 st petersburg florida 33705-1718 violation address 2067 betty lane clearwater florida 33755 who is here for that case who's here on behalf of the county officer hughes i see no one in the hearing room that i can't identify and know who they are uh has anybody signed in for this case no magistrate have you received any phone calls voicemails or emails no magistrate all right please raise your right hand do you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth i do county may proceed okay so the property where the alleged violation exists is located in unincorporated pinellas county three four i apologize i just realized i think i grabbed the wrong folder that's right i'm just going to wing this here okay so um where the property exists is the 2067 betty lane um in unincorporated pinellas county and the owner is mr justin inman and i have had uh conversations with him the violations have been in occurrence uh since honor before uh the in the initial violation which was sent um on june 15th of 2026 um i did reach out to mr inman or excuse me he reached out to me when i posted the property and uh had stated that he had never received any notices of violation so upon uh researching it i realized that the original notice of violations that the area area officer had mailed had actually been sent to the wrong apartment number so as a result i told him that i would re-notice um the property and hence the reason that you see the notice of rescheduling so um uh we rescheduled it from september 14th i went ahead and resent the uh notices of violation on september 12th and have remained in contact with mr inman uh the entire time and i'll i'll get into that in just a minute so um so basically we have the notice of rescheduling to today's date we have the initial notice of hearing in that packet that had gone out on september 14th and then we have the new notices of violation that i sent with the correct department number the 1311 like as i said the first ones went out with just apartment 13. so we had the notice of violation with the minimum housing violations for the certificate of use and for the advertising we have the tax collector documentation showing that he's the owner of record and his correct mailing address uh same with property appraiser with the same address we have the general warranty deed and we have the email communication that i've had with him when he had initially contacted us um he wanted to know how to come into compliance and i had basically explained to either get the certificate um or to remove the listings or or change it to more than 30 days um in the uh in the advertising so um anyways so we were communicating back and forth um i went ahead and just to include them in the documents you've got the notices that were sent to him originally through uh the housing or from the housing official just letting them know about the short-term rental it does show that his short-term rental advertising listing is active and then a minimum nights of two so showing that it was in violation and then you have the actual advertisement um from airbnb showing that he's listing the home as a short-term rental with a minimum two night stay and you can see that he's got reviews showing that people are actually staying there uh so magistrate um the property was reinspected on october 6 of 2026 um he was still using the property as a short-term uh rental or and was advertising it at that time so i'd like to submit them as a composite exhibit b hearing no objection exhibit b will be admitted into evidence uh so basically again it just had my um my emails to him letting him know that it was rescheduled for today's date i have had communication with him he has decided that he doesn't want to continue to use this as a short-term rental that he is going to change it to um long-term rental for 30 days or more and he he stated uh that he has um by email actually changed it but it hasn't updated so um anyways for for right now we've got our email communication obviously um you've got showing that his active his listing is still active which i verified today again the minimum of two nights his uh listing still showing a minimum of two nights and that uh stayed a few nights stayed a few nights so showing that he is using it or was using it as a short-term rental so when he emailed me to let me know that he was going to turn it into a long-term rental and not the short-term rental i did tell him that i would still be moving it forward today and asking for the allowance of uh 30 days in that um i need that uh website to be updated so i can verify that he has actually changed it so magistrate the county requests that you find the property in violation of 22 319 g1 and is asking for the allowance of 30 days to comply and have still found in violation to assign a daily fine amount of 500 per day per violation for code section 22 319 g1 and award the cost of 230 dollars about the other two relations um because he is changing it i'm just going for the for the certificate of use violation code when is 30 days november the 11th all right um i haven't seen anyone come into the hearing room since we started this uh have you got any voicemails or uh emails concerning this no magistrate all right i'm going to find that there is a violation of code section 22-319 g1 order the property be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 11 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so we'll assess a finding the amount of 500 per day i am going to dismiss the violation of code section 22-319 i2 and 22-319 i3 without prejudice well says cost the amount of 230 dollars please read item number four item four department code enforcement matter minimum housing short-term rental 22-319 g1 case number ccm-26-00121 officer b hughes owner brito howard notice address brito howard 3211 stevenson street plant city florida 33566-9517 violation address 3442 azalea place largo florida 33771 is there anyone here for that case did anyone sign in for this case no magistrate i don't see anybody in the hearing room that i don't know who they are and why they're here um have you received any voicemails or emails concerning this no magistrate all right who's here on behalf of county officer hughes please raise your right hand you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth i do county may proceed thank you so the property where the alleged violation exists is located in unincorporated pinellas county at 3442 azalea place largo florida 33771 the owner howard brito is not present for today's hearing and i've not had any communication from him uh the violation has been in occurrence since honor before august 18th of 2026 and i would like to enter in um i would like to enter into evidence the notice of hearing composite exhibit a which includes the notice of violations pinellas county tax collector and property appraiser databases the warranty deed the short-term rental notices and the short-term rental listings and advertisements hearing no objection exhibit a will be admitted into evidence thank you okay so we have the notice of hearing for today's date uh we have the notice of violations uh for the short-term rental certificate and for advertising back on august 18th of 2026 we have the tax collector information showing the address of record property appraiser with the same the warranty deed we have the uh notices from the housing official uh letting them know it was a short or had been identified as a short-term rental and what was required for the certificate warning notice and then we have the short-term rental listings it shows that the listing is active minimum of one night just all the different documented stays it shows the listing itself um with basically the advertising as a short-term rental they had another listing on airbnb showing the listing is active with a minimum of two nights and then you have the airbnb advertisement showing the pictures of the home showing that the entire home is being listed and then showing all the different times that it has been uh rented out so magistrate the property was reinspected on october 6 of 2026 the violations continue short-term rental listings and advertisements continue and i would like to submit the short-term rental listings and advertisements as composite exhibit b hearing no objection exhibit b will be admitted into evidence so after i posted the property i did get a phone call from the property managers that uh run the short-term rentals for the um the owner uh they did not dispute at all that it's not being that it is being used as a short-term rental uh you can still see that the listing shows active minimum of two nights for the first listing and again they're the property managers are not disputing at all that it's being used as a short-term rental um basically got showing that the house is being rented again just showing that they people are renting it leaving reviews the other website showing it's active minimum of one night and again just their their listing and showing that the documented stays and that they don't have all the required information on their listing so the property manager who has been in contact with me uh does want to bring the property into compliance they're having a hard time getting contact with the owner so they're going to be continuing to try to contact the owner they need some kind of documentation allowing them to apply for the certificate of use from the owner so they are actively working toward doing that so as a result magistrate the county requests that you find the property in violation of 22 319 g and 22 319 i and is asking for the allowance of 30 days to comply and if still found in violation to assign a daily fine amount of 500 per day and to award the county costs in the amount of 230 dollars on the agenda all i have is elation 22-319 g1 the notice of violation is for 22 319 g and 22 319 i and that's the reason why i was asking for those vote violation codes how many days are you requesting for compliance um i had asked for 30 if the property managers are able to get contact with the owner and need a little more time i'll certainly be flexible and work with them but for right now 30 days sir when it's 30 days november the 11th all right i haven't seen anyone come into the hearing room since we started this carolina have you received any voicemails or uh emails no magistrate all right i'm going to find that there's a violation code section 22-319 g order the property to be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 11th 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so failing to do so will assess a fine in the amount of 500 per day i'm going to find that there is a violation code section 22-319 subsection i order that the property be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 11th 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so will assess a fine in the amount of 500 per day i will also assess cost the amount of 230 dollars thank you magistrate is there a file for item six so item six i believe the um magistrate officer hughes is going to come up and she's requesting a continuance for that one please read item number six item six department code enforcement matter 58-444 noise ordinance code violation 22-299 minimum housing code violation case number ccm-26-00123 officer b hughes owner borbus jeffrey notice address borbus jeffrey 7801 63rd way north pinellas park florida three three seven eight one dash two one two eight violation address six six one five twenty seven street north st petersburg florida three three seven zero two all right who's here for that case i don't see anybody in the hearing room um that i don't know who they are and why they're here um it's my understanding uh officer hughes that you are requesting a continuance yes sir do you need me to explain why yes please so the reason for the continuance is you don't necessarily need to get a short-term rental certificate if you live at the property and he's claiming to live there however he has a different property as a homestead address and so we're just trying to get clarification and i told him that we would continue it till november 16th so we can get clarification of where he resides um and to ensure that we actually um need to move forward with the um short-term rental certificate violation all right that sounds reasonable um and since he's not here to object to it i will grant the continuance to november 16th 2025 thank you sir 2026 2026 at 8 30 a.m at 8 30 a.m yes the time just please read item number seven item seven case dismissed by code enforcement department code enforcement matter minimum housing short-term rental 22-319g case number ccm-26-00122 officer b hughes owner volkov mikaida kilinskayana notice address volkov mikaida kilinskayana 3641 140th avenue north largo florida 33771-4193 violation address 3641 140th avenue north largo florida 33771-4193 my understanding that case um has been dismissed by code enforcement yes sir they're now in compliance all right please read item number eight item eight department code enforcement matter minimum housing short-term rentals 22-319g 22-319i case number ccm-26-00124 officer e stevens owner ap properties inc notice address ap properties inc 27100 coyote ridge lane johnston colorado 80534-8209 violation address 1209196 place seminal florida 33771 is there anyone here for that case i don't see anyone in the hearing room that i don't recognize and know why they're here anybody sign in for this case no magistrate have you received any emails or uh voicemails concerning this no magistrate who's here for the county officer stevens would you please raise your right hand do you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth i do county may proceed yes magistrate on the property where the alleged violation exists is at 1209196 place and that is located in seminal florida 33772 located also in the unincorporated of pinellas county the owner ap properties incorporated are not present or represented for today's hearing however i did speak with him on october 9th last week and he is currently on his way back from mexico after being there for several months the violation has or have been in occurrence since on or before september 1st of 2026 i'd like to enter the notice of hearing and the composite exhibit a into evidence which includes the notice of violation pinellas county tax collector the property appraiser the deed an information letter from our pinellas county housing official dated march 28th 2025 another information letter from our pinellas county housing official dated august 18th of 2025 a warning notice from our pinellas county housing official dated november 25th of 2025 and a seller report showing no short-term rental application a rental unit rec excuse me rental unit record and multiple active airbnb booking.com homes and villas by marriott and a vrb website listing which are all showing active all right hearing no objection exhibit a will be admitted into evidence first is going to be the notice of hearing consists of four pages the second will be the ap properties incorporated notice of violation for the short-term rental standards here in pinellas county we have the pinellas county tax collector which shows the owner of record of the property owner the same for the pinellas county property appraiser the warranty deed and also the colorado department of state which shows ap properties as their address and then following the information letters that were sent to ap properties incorporated from our housing official this one dated march 28th this one dated august 18th of 2025 of last year a warning notice that was sent to them on november 25th of last year 2025 and a seller record showing that there has been no application for the short-term rental or a certificate on file next this will show that the property is being uh rented out through host compliance and it shows that it has been used on active listings throughout not only 2026 but also 2025 and as far back as to 2023 on this page and 2022 as a final next i will be showing you the active listings for airbnb the first one showing home at seminal throughout any of the narrative on the the property does not show anything that falls under 22319 subsection i for the advertisement as of that date i could still rent the property for six nights for a cost of thirteen hundred and forty four dollars i'll be showing you the booking.com advertisement same property again none of the part of the listing at all has anything that falls under the 22319 subsection i and as you can tell you can still rent it for three nights at 830 dollars the last one will be the homes and villas by marriott again the property showing as you did in the last two and the home details of the property does not show anything that falls under the 22319 subsection i again this property can be rented for fourteen hundred and sixty eight dollars and the last vrbo same property same type of listing again nothing that falls under 22319 subsection i is listed in any of the the verbiage throughout the property magistrate the property was reinspected on september 24th 2026 initially and again on october 9th of 2026 and the violations continue the desk investigation was complete on this date and i would like to submit those uh items as composite exhibit b which you may have in your possession exhibit b will be admitted into evidence again the acela record shows no application or certificate on file for that property and again the listing is still active as of this date still showing rental dates dating back till 2022 as initially shown and the airbnb has not changed since the initial investigation again lacking all the information that's needed under 22319 subsection i and again it can be rented for thirteen hundred and forty four dollars for six nights we have a booking.com same information lacking the necessary information under 22319 subsection i and still can be rented for three nights at eight hundred thirty dollars homes and villas same as the previous lacking the same information required and again can be rented for fourteen hundred and sixty eight dollars and again last vrbo website as previously shown again this one also lacking the same information required magistrate the county requests that you find the property in violation and issue in order to have the property brought into compliance the county is asking for an allowance of 30 days to comply if still found in violation assign a single daily fine amount of 500 per day for each violation under 22 319 g and 22 319 i code sections and court costs of two or 230 dollars okay i have a concern um the notice of hearing doesn't indicate that the notice of hearing was sent to the respondent ap it just has the magistrate officer and code enforcement listed as who's who's getting copies of this do you have any information to the contrary um i did speak to um um excuse me i did speak to mr glasgow he did receive a copy of it and he was the one that contacted me uh by phone on friday the 9th okay i'm going to continue this to uh november 16th caroline november 16th yeah um i do not is that your date it's the date you've been giving me today i believe right um that's our next hearing okay november 16th i don't know if it's mine or not but since you will give me those dates i assumed it was yeah november 16th is mine okay perfect right so november 16th okay at 8 30 and obviously there needs to be uh notice of that hearing sent thank you by the street thank you okay we're going to take a five minute adjournment communications please stop recording would you please read item number nine item nine department code enforcement matter minimum housing short-term rental 22-319g 22-319i case number ccm-26-00125 officer e stevens owner holzhauer jacob posey elissa notice address holzhauer jacob posey elissa 6886 49th avenue north st petersburg florida 33709 all right who's here for that case i don't see anyone in the hearing room that i don't know who they are and why they're here um who's here for the county officer stevens magistrate anyone sign in for this case have you received any voicemails or emails concerning this hearing no magistrate all right please raise your right hand do you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth i do county may proceed the property with the alleged violation that exists is 6886 49th avenue st petersburg florida 33709 located in unincorporated pinellas county the owner jacob hosehauser and elissa posey are not present or represented for today's hearing however i did run into mr holzhauer during the time of posting and he explained that he and his partner were going to take care of this and move forward with it the violations have the violation has occurred since on or before july 22nd 2026 i would like to enter the notice of hearing and composite exhibit a into evidence which includes a notice of violation pinellas county tax collector the property appraiser deed a seller report showing no str application rental unit record an active air airbnb and vrb website listings hearing no objection exhibit a will be admitted into evidence first the documents are the notice of hearing notice of violation pinellas county tax collector pinellas county property appraiser warranty deed a seller record this is showing that the it is an active website it's showing documented stays at that location the airbnb website the verbiage for the website and the calendar on the actual website showing that it can be rented for six nights at 933 dollars vbr vrbo website also showing that it could be rented for 211 dollars for six nights i'm sorry for 1200 and 64. magistrate the property was reinspected on september 28 2026 initially and again on october 12 2026 and the violations continue the desk invasion investigation was completed on this date and i would like to submit them as composite exhibit b which you should have in the possession hearing no objection exhibit b will be admitted into evidence again a copy of the sl record the record still showing documented stays at that location as of the date that was posted there has been a new airbnb website that was added to it and i'll get to that this one's showing airbnb the verbiage five nights at 923 this is the most current website that was just open recently they're showing three guests one bedroom one bath i guess they're going to try to just use it as a unit so they only have to use as a bedroom and not have to go through with it i have not heard anything from the owners uh or they have not taken down their other websites so we're still going to proceed with the under 22 319 g and i again this one bedroom can be for four nights at 590 dollars and the vrbo that you saw earlier still active showing it could be rented for four nights at 868 dollars magistrate the county requests that you find the property in violation and issue an order to have the property brought into compliance the county is asking for the allowance of 30 days to comply and have still found a violation assigned a single daily amount fine of 500 per day for each violation under 22 319 g and 22 319 i code sections and a court cost of 230 dollars all right i haven't seen anyone come into the hearing room since we started this hearing um caroline have you received any phone calls or emails since we started the hearing no magistrate all right when is 30 days november the 11th all right i'm going to find a violation code section 22-319 subsection g order the property to be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 11th 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so we'll assess a finding the amount of 500 per day i'm going to find that there's a violation of code section 22-319 subsection i order that the property be brought into compliance within 30 days which is november 11th 2026 at 5 p.m failing to do so we'll assess a finding amount of 500 per day i will also assess cost the amount of 230 dollars thank you madam straight all right would you please read item number 11 item 11 department code enforcement matter minimum housing short-term rental 22-319 i-1-2 case number ccm-26-00129 officer d deval owner polina sotio polina roina notice address polina sotio polina roina 889 marcen court glenn ellen illinois 60137 violation address 795 claudia lane palm harbor florida 34683 anyone here for that case i don't see anyone in the room that i don't recognize and know why they're here uh did anyone sign in for this case no magistrate and have you received any voicemails or emails concerning this no magistrate who's appearing for the county officer deval would you please raise your right hand you swear to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth i do you may proceed uh magistrate the property where this alleged violation exists is located at 795 claudia lane in palm harbor which is in unincorporated pinellas county the owners sotio and rowena polina are not present for today's hearing the violation has been an occurrence since honor before a july 2nd of 2026 i'd like to enter the notice of hearing and composite exhibit a which includes the notice of violation ownership confirmation through pinellas county tax collector property appraiser the deed and the advertisements through airbnb and vrbo platforms hearing no objection exhibit a will be admitted into off um evidence okay the first four pages of exhibit a are again the notice of violation sent to the property owners at the address of record we have the notice of violation sent out back in july tax collector confirming ownership of uh said owners of the polinas and we have a property appraiser these are reflecting the same the warranty deed of when they took ownership of the property dated back from february 22nd of 2022. we have here this is from airbnb confirming they are a active uh short-term rental this is their history of uh documented stays and listing dates and so on it's a very active property it's a very large beautiful home and this here just then it does confirm we have uh we have here that it is hosted by a lady by the name of helena i have spoken with this pro this representative for the property i was hopeful that she was going to be here today because she has been active and engaged in getting this property into compliance there is a short-term uh rental certificate that has been issued for this property but it is the advertising that had continued to be out of compliance that brings us here today so we have here this uh extensive listing here from uh airbnb one of the violations was the carbon monoxide alarm showed that they did not have it and that was a requirement that it not only had it but it was listed and shown in their advertisement they also did not have the necessary uh disclosures to state how many people were maximum capacity uh parking limitations and also the statements stating that they were uh in a residential location and to be courteous of noise with the neighbors and so on this was uh all of the advertisement here through uh very extensive advertisement through airbnb and they were lacking all of those things this is through vrbo and it was the same type of thing uh they did acknowledge the maximum capacity of 10 which was correct and what was what what was allowed but they did not not have the other disclosures um statements uh and so on that was needed and required even again in important information uh it did not have what was necessary so after working with the property uh representative and a desk inspection that was conducted on um october 9th the property is in compliance at this time um all of the the advertisements are now reflecting the correct identifiers and statements and all that is necessary and it is also only being advertised on airbnb and not not vrbo so i did pull here that they have um all of the necessary it says occupancy of 10 parking for four their dvpr license their uh str certificate number all of that is properly documented um of course they have many many reviews because this is a very popular rental so all of that is being properly listed and i had i guess i just blew this up a little bit making a little bit easier to read and then they did have the please note your vacation or residential area um disclosure and notation that needs to be uh basically to respect for the noise level respect the neighbors and so on so all of that is now present in their advertisements so county uh magistrate the county is looking for a finding of fact for this property for code sections 20 or code section 22-319 i section one and two of subsection i and to be awarded court costs of 230 dollars all right i haven't seen anyone come into the hearing room since we started this hearing um have you received any uh voicemails or emails since we started the hearing no magistrate all right i'm going to find that there was a violation of code section 22-319 i subsection one and subsection two that it has been remedied so this is a finding of fact i will make no further order concerning it but i will assess costs in the amount of 230 dollars thank you magistrate all right that um concludes the agenda for today do you want me to adjourn the hearing before we get the orders done yes so everybody can leave um are there any county attorney matters hearing none the hearing is closed and adjourned communications please stop recording