people please to turn off your electronic devices for those of you who haven't had the pleasure of coming before us before our meetings are recorded and so if you're going to be speaking please do what I'm doing get up close to the mic kiss it and it will make life much easier for the people who have to transcribe the minutes of our meeting thank you you're going to be reading that in just a moment okay it's two o'clock welcome to the November meeting of the Dunedin code enforcement board my name is Phil Stone and I am the chair we will now read the call to order a statement of
purpose before proceeding I'll set forth the purpose of this board the code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the code or codes and ordinances of the city of Dunedin have occurred in order to meet that obligation all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation all witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth the city through its staff will present the evidence its evidence of the alleged violation after the city has completed this presentation the respondent shall afford the opportunity to present its evidence any members of the board the person presenting the city's case or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board the respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted to question any of the witnesses before the board and present brief opening and closing statements if so desired the board will then openly deliberate considering only the evidence presented the law and common knowledge by motion duly made and seconded discussed and approved by at least four members of the board an order will be issued the order will contain one the findings of fact to the conclusion of law three from affirmative action to be taken the order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail we will now continue with our
hearings thank you the next item on the agenda is an opportunity for people members of the public citizens to speak before the board if you do not have a matter that's on the agenda so we have two gentlemen in the audience are you both here on scheduled cases okay thank you okay the next item on the agenda would be the approval of the minutes from our last meeting of october 7th they were distributed to members of the board i'll entertain a motion to approve unless someone has any questions comments or edits that need to be made jeremy reynolds i so move thank you a second please lisa hunt second
thank you lisa um do we need a roll call mr gillette hi mr boldock hi miss hunt hi mr sweetser
hi mr reynolds hi mr alexander hi chair stone hi the motion passes um the next item would be the swearing in of staff and the public anyone who's going to be testifying before the board please rise raise your right hands i do thank you uh item number three on our agenda we have two affidavits of compliance who is going to present for the city go ahead good afternoon board um can you bring the
mic closer to your mouth okay my name is rachel laurel city of dunedin co-compliance inspector testifying in reference to case number 25 uh 25 dash 1299 the property is located at 1445 overcash drive in dunedin florida at the august 5th 20 uh 2025 hearing the board ordered a correction of the violation by october 6th 2025 or a fine amount of 50 per day shall be imposed i inspected the property on october 7th 2025 and found that the violation was corrected so i am submitting
an affidavit of compliance for the board's approval thank you do any board members have any questions no then i'll entertain a motion to accept the affidavit daniel baldock i move in case number
25-1299 for the property located at 1445 overcash drive to find the respondent antoinette gugliata did correct the violations of code sections ac25-1299 on or before the compliance date of october 6th and accept the affidavit of compliance thank you i'll entertain a second lisa hunt second
thank you lisa mr gillette aye mr boldock aye miss hunt aye mr sweetser aye mr reynolds aye mr alexander
aye chair stone aye and the motion passes well the next item on the agenda uh item 3b is case number 25-1650 also an affidavit of compliance who is speaking to that i am thank you uh good afternoon
board my name is rachel laurel city of dunedin co compliance inspector testifying in reference to case number 25-1650 the property is located at 554 baywood drive north dunedin florida at the october 7th 2025 hearing the board ordered a correction of the violation by october 17 2025 or a fine amount of $50 per day shall be imposed i inspected the property on october 14 2025 and also yesterday and found that the property was uh the violation was corrected so i am submitting the affidavit of compliance to the board for the board's approval thank you do any board members have any questions
of the inspector no if not i'll entertain a motion to accept the affidavit um sorry can you hear me now
yeah just a quick comment on this case some of you board members received an email from this respondent i just want to remind the board members to not reply to this email as this may implicate sunshine law violations or forward this email to anyone other than the city attorney want to let you know that i already have a copy of the email the property has come into compliance i'm not sure if the respondent is here today yes that's him there you know he's allowed to speak as to the affidavit before a motion is entertained but in regards to the email please refrain from um replying
okay so we have a motion and a second to accept the affidavit of compliance sir do you want to be heard for the record state your name and your address please and as i said you need to kiss the mic
somehow yeah thank you my name is brett krasman 554 baywood drive north dunedin florida uh i know you had a meeting in october and i spoke to rachel before prior to it but i was never notified there was never anything posted on my house i haven't been living there i was one of the worst house damaged it damaged in the storm and i'm not living there i'm not getting things things aren't always in the mailbox the mailbox keeps flying open and things keep you know ending up down the street so i was not notified of that hearing but the whole thing started i had to take the boat trailer out because i have to get the boat out but i was using it also to haul stuff on you can haul anything in a boat trailer with a sheet of plywood so granted the fact that i was using that trailer for other things i don't like the fact that i had to go and relocate the trailer but i'll accept the fact that you're gonna if you want to let this go we will but i will state the city has caused has caused several violations on my property and i'm sure you're aware of them uh but you guys might not be but it's in regard with mr stephen stone at 491 baywood drive north and uh just like to uh mention that
so okay well thank you so um when the motion to accept the affidavit of compliance is completed it really ends the matter as far as this board is concerned excuse me i said when we proceed with the motion to accept the city's affidavit of compliance that will conclude this matter okay okay yes just so you're clear thank you okay thank you okay we have a motion in a second can you call
the roll please i apologize who was it that made the motion i'm so sorry i don't know okay i need
someone to make a motion to accept this affidavit chris alexander i move in case number two five dash one six five oh city versus krasman brett d for the purposes for the property located at five five four baywood drive north to find the respondent brett kassman did correct the violations of code sections i don't see that on the paper okay ac two five dash one six five oh and to accept the
affidavit of compliance okay we have a motion i need a second jeremy reynolds i second thank you
thank you roll call please mr gillette aye mr bulldog aye miss hunt aye mr sweetser aye mr reynolds
aye mr alexander aye chair stone aye and the motion passes thank you sir you can you're welcome to stay it's an open meeting okay the next item on our agenda is new business it will be case number 25 dash 1913 uh the city of dunedin versus klaus scher concerning the property of 1209 royal oak drive
who is going to be speaking on that i am miss laurel yes okay good afternoon board members my name is rachel laurel co-compliance inspector for the city of dunedin i'll be showing a powerpoint presentation for the property located at 1209 royal oak drive this is in reference to case number 25 dash 1913 the respondent is klaus o scher his address and he resides at 1209 royal oak drive the zoning is single family home in the r60 zoning district number of violations are two of dco section thirty four dash one paren a environment offensive accumulation uh subsection a it shall be unlawful for any person to accumulate leave dump or store openly on any premises with a residential zoning classification any building materials automobile tires inoperable or derelict vehicles and any and all other articles of personal property which may be seen from the public right away or abutting properties for a period greater than three days unless the storage of such articles on residential premises is specifically allowed under other provisions of the code a second violation number is dco section 34 dash 32 premises to be kept clean a notice of offensive accumulation it shall be unlawful for the occupant or owner of any house yard store lot or parcel of land to refuse to keep the same clean or to permit any trash weeds or other offensive matter of any kind to accumulate in or upon such premises and such accumulation shall be deemed to be a public nuisance a notice of violation was posted to the property city hall and sent certified mail to the owner on october 1st 2025 with a compliance date of october 11th 2025 the certified mail for the notice of violation was signed for by the owner on october 7th 2025 this is my initial inspection on september 30th is showing the front of the house um there's an accumulation of items on the driveway is uh the cones other traffic uh device uh looks like trunk to a palm tree here is the side of the garage um that has a trailer with items on the trailer uh covered up with a tarp uh there's also pallets fence sections uh plastic containers this was on my initial inspection the day that i posted the notice of violation on october 1st showed um concrete bumpers to uh parking spots at shopping centers um other black rubber bumper items behind that concrete bumper cones uh some plastic uh item that's rolled up here's a closer picture shows uh wood um plastic containers coolers uh everything visible uh to the street on his driveway here's the side of the house uh showing the the same items uh the items under the tarp on the trailer fence sections containers here is a picture of my affidavit of posting and notice of violation posted to his front door here's a close-up picture of the affidavit of posting and notice of violation here is a picture of the certified mailing banner page as well as the signature that was sent certified mail on october 1st and the notice of violation was signed for october 7th at 107 pm october 20th is a re-inspection after the notice of violation which shows uh there's been some improvements but still items uh left on the driveway here's a close-up picture you can see the cooler plastic container mailbox um car mats car parts buckets here's the other side of the um garage door showing bricks and what looks like a a wig here's the side of the house showing pallets miscellaneous items on the trailer um fence sections all the items still remaining october 22nd is the day that i posted the notice of hearing i did leave a door hanger for mr scherr on october 20th telling him the items uh needed it to be removed and that i was going to be scheduling him for this month's uh board hearing uh the items still look the same from my initial inspection uh on the driveway here's a close-up picture showing no change again the other side of the uh garage and here's the side of the garage on the pallets the items in the trailer uh here is a picture of the affidavit of posting and notice of hearing post postages front door and here's a close-up picture and here's a the banner page for the certified mail and next to it is the signature uh his signature showing that it was signed for on october 25th at 12 55. this picture i took this morning uh of the of the driveway there's more items um on the on the driveway here's a close-up picture still showing the cones uh the bed uh truck bed uh and wood uh more miscellaneous items on on the driveway and here's the side of the uh the garage he removed the trailer because he has fence sections on it and the items that are on the driveway and on the side or what what was on the trailer so there's pallets uh the brown item up against the garage looks like a shell of some electronic i don't know equipment uh the pallets and that's a inflatable boat um that was on the trailer here's another picture to the bottom of the picture you can see there's a pvc pipe those are the the wood posts he has a permit and that's the next case he's going to be installing a fence in this location um and there's the inflatable boat and uh pallets and other items on the side of the garage and now i'll leave it for
the board to deliberate okay so we have um two separate cases uh before us today um i think what i'm going to do is first uh offer board members an opportunity to ask you questions um and then sir you'll have an opportunity to speak and the same will be true for you okay yep so do any members of the board have questions for the city inspector i do please and chairman rolls for the board can you
take me back to the the slide that shows the the receipt for the initial notice of violation he said
that was sent on what date yeah that was mailed on october 1st and signed for on the 7th of october
okay okay thank you that that's all the question i have okay do other board members have questions of
the city lisa lisa hunt um am i allowed to ask him a question now yes directed to thank you am i um right in having heard you said that he is planning to put a fence up and has the permit yes okay that's
for his for his trailer that's the next case okay that's all i had okay thank you uh any other
questions from board members concerning this case has the uh have you had communication with chris
alexander sir before you speak say your name it makes it easier for the transcriber so she just
interested chris alexander has there was there promises to rectify it or to clean it up or anything
was there direct communication i communicate him uh with him on this case on the 20th we usually communicate with door hangers um we do communicate on the phone because there's been prior cases um at this location so this for this case i did leave him a door hanger and i told him that the items needed
to be removed there haven't been any conversations per se conversations yes i did speak to him later
he did call on that day on october 20th and i told him that i can't keep granting extensions i get complaints from the neighbors multiple complaints over the year and a half i've been here um for the
condition of the property were there any promises made or any agreements made about it not in regard to
this case i think he has health issues which is stopping him from i guess complying and i told him i have to take him to the board and get a compliance order so this way it can be cleaned i have an agreement with the neighbor next door that i could go on his property that's where these pictures are
taken at any time no i just went with the with the defendant but okay thank you yes thank you okay if no
other board members have questions of the city let's hear from the respondent mr sure boss oliver
sure 1209 royal oak drive dunedin florida i want to apologize to rachel i want to apologize to the board this year's been a rough one i had total knee replacement in february four and a half hour back surgery in march total shoulder replacement last month i'm waiting for my neck i have bone on bone on my wrists i have a really hard time getting stuff going needless to say i know it's been rough i had to wait two months to get all the supplies together because i'm on fixed income military and social security only i have everything i talked to a guy that's working down the street he's going to help me do the fence at cost which is nice of him and it should be rectified within the time allotted
hopefully like i said i really it's been okay you you you understand that the uh city's ordinance refers to trash and debris on the property right merely putting it behind a fence will not abate the
violation well you told me that if i put the trailer that's a that's the separate case we haven't gotten
to that case okay that we'll get to that in just a moment once the fence is up everything is going
to be gone i have another vehicle that's another thing i had my shoulder done last month and i had a bad car accident totaled my vehicle hence the seat belt ripped the heck out of my shoulder that put me
behind another couple of weeks okay so so the two issues that are before us now on this case or the offensive accumulation of the items that you saw in the photographs right are you saying that you have someone to help you remove all of that i have somebody that's going to help me put the fence
up and and help me remove stuff yet okay i have a big van i want to be loading up okay most of the stuff is actually fixable that i fix and donate to the sheriff's youth ranch i donate a lot of things after the storms hit people were throwing away good stuff which is a shame i'm german i know i can fix stuff even electronic stuff i took it and hosed it down drowned it let it sit on the driveway which is a bad thing let it dry out hoses it off again eighty percent of the stuff worked after that okay but you
you you understand that it can't be in the driveway invisible from the neighbors or the public way right everything is going to be gone okay does this does the city have a recommendation as to a date how much time sir do you think you need to do this hopefully within the month okay recommendation for
case number 25-1913 two violations of dco section 34-1 parent a offensive accumulation and dco section 34-32 premises to be kept clean of offensive accumulation requesting compliance on or before november 14th 2025 which is 10 days from today's board hearing for the owner to remove the offensive accumulation items or given the severity of the violation is minor i am requesting a fine amount of 150 per day for each day the violation continues to exist okay so what we have now is the respondent
saying 30 days and the city recommending 10 days for a compliance date do any members of the board have
questions for the respondent mr sure uh dan bolder is there anybody sir that can just come over and help you move the stuff to just get it put away neatly maybe in the garage i'm 70 years old yeah i got
neighbor that has teenage kids and they don't like to work i asked him told him that i was going to pay him a hundred dollars to help me move stuff around he said oh i'll be there shortly well he never showed up so this contractor showed up yesterday wanted to park in front of my house and i said yes as long as you help me pull the trailer up and if you have time to put a fence up for me and he said my brother-in-law is going to do it for you so i already have everything on the line okay like i say defined help i'm german i
like to do everything by myself well you can't do it yourself sir unfortunately because it's limiting you from picking up those heavy items and doing all that so the city's recommending 10 days do you feel that 10 days is enough time to move all that debris and this is aside from the next case which is the trailer we were just talking about the debris do you think 10 days is enough time i'd rather have
until the end of the month okay i don't have any questions any other board members with questions for
the respondent lisa lisa hunt um i understand what you're saying i'm also a veteran and i understand it's hard for you to ask for help but like the gentleman said you really have to i do and if you need to go to your your american legion or your vfw locally i guarantee they will help you so please reach out thank you sir get this done my recommendation is for december 1st okay before we get to a motion do
any other board members have questions for the respondent if not i'll entertain a motion
jeremy reynolds i move in case number 25-1913 city of beneden versus colossal sure let the board find the respondent in violation of city code sections 34-1a and 34-32 for offensive accumulation at the property located at 1209 royal oak drive i further move the board ordered respondent to bring the property into compliance by december 5th of 2025 if the property is not in compliance by that date a fine of 150 per day shall be imposed beginning on december 6th in 2025 and continuing until compliance is verified that the amount should not exceed the cost of enforcement respondent is ordered to contact the code compliance office for re-inspection to confirm compliance with this
order i so move i'm sorry was your date december 5th yeah december 5th friday okay um that will take us past our next board meeting correct okay okay we have a motion do i have a second and boldock second
thank you roll call please mr gillette aye mr boldock aye miss hunt hi mr sweetser aye mr reynolds
aye mr alexander aye chair stone all right the motion passes and an order will issue okay sir you can stay there or sit down whichever is more comfortable for you um we have one more case concerning your property um and that is case number 25-1915 miss laurel are you also speaking to that yes you have the
floor uh good afternoon board members my name is rachel laurel co-compliance inspector for the city of dunedin uh i'm showing you a powerpoint presentation for the property located at 1209 royal oak drive case number 25-1915 the respondent is clause o sure he resides at 1209 royal oak drive the zoning is single-family home in the r60 zoning district number of violations one of dco section 105-27.1.1.1 paren f paren zoning district design standards site standards for housing and duplexes utility trailers boats recreational vehicles and other recreational equipment standards subsection one utility trailers boats recreational equipment and recreational vehicles may not be parked or stored in any portion of the front yard to include the build uh buildable area unless actual loading or unloading with four hour max is taken place subsection five no utility trailers boats or other recreational equipment and recreational vehicles shall be located between the minimum setbacks established in chapter 103 zoning unless screened by a six foot privacy fence a notice of violation was posted to the property city hall and sent certified mail to the owner on october 1st 2025 with a compliance date of october 11th 2025 certified mail for the notice of violation was signed for by the owner on october 7 2025 at 107 pm a notice of hearing was posted to the the property city hall and sent certified mail to the owner on october 22nd 2025 that certified mail for the notice of hearing was signed for by the owner on october 25th 2025 at 12 55 pm this picture was taken on september 30th which was my initial inspection you could see the trailer being parked or stored on the side of the side of the garage october 1st is the date of the posting of the notice of violation you can see with my arrow that it is showing you the location where the trailer is parked or stored alongside of the garage here is a picture again of the trailer being stored on the side of the property here is an affidavit of posting and notice of violation on october 1st attached to the front door here's a close-up picture of the affidavit of posting and notice of violation here's a picture of the banner page as well as the signed certified mail the notice of violation was sent certified mail october 1st 2025 and it was signed for on october 7th 2025 at 107 pm a re-inspection after the notice of violation was done on october 20th 2025 and the trailer still remains on the side of the garage here's a picture of the day of the posting of the notice of hearing on october 22nd 2025 the arrow is reflecting where the trailer continues to be parked and stored here's another picture of the trailer being parked stored on the side of the garage and here's a pit uh here's the posting a picture of the posting uh now affidavit of posting a notice of hearing on october 22nd here's a close-up picture of it on the front door on october 22nd here's a banner page shown the notice of hearing was sent certified mail october 22nd 2025 and signed for on october 25th 2025 at 12 55 pm here's a picture uh that i took this morning the trailer is now connected to the back of his pickup truck uh with fence sections and here's a picture on the side uh showing the trailer with the fence sections and i'll leave for the board to deliberate thank you uh do members of
the board have any questions for the city no questions mr shore would you like to come up now
am i able to put my trailer behind the fence like it said right yes i have one issue i helped my parents build that house in 1978 when i got out of the military the new neighbor there's been a few new neighbors on that side on the right side facing the house and he put up his fencing and said his little fences on his side of the property and the trees that are there the hedge we plant it and he says no that's my property so i've been taking care of those hedges since 78 i have an issue can the city
come out just stay focused on i'm staying focused we're not about the hedge it's about the trailer it's
a big difference on where i'm going to legally put my fence is there a way the city can come out there and verify the lineage on it absolutely i think that he's encroaching yes absolutely when
you file for the permit you're you're required to provide a survey for the fence right okay and that'll state the property line okay someone from the city can come out and post and mark to make sure that both parties of the side of the fence that would be very appreciative because like i say i don't
want to put the fence in the wrong place because i'm putting it in with concrete yes so the the
inspectors that would come out after the fence is built they would also look at the survey that you provide when you when you submit the permit and it has to match that right right so if you need somebody to come out prior to make sure that the survey is accurate for me in the front but sir it's your
responsibility to obtain the survey yes well okay so technically i just go off that board and measure
it from side to side you would be best to have a proper surveyor do it he has walter sweetser do you
have you applied for a permit yet yes that's what i was going to say he has a permit he picked up his permit he's he's ready to build the fence so he provided what was needed he needs to go off of what was on the permit right as far as the location because you could build the fence in it doesn't
have to be right at the property line you could be a foot i mean you're you just can't cross the property line okay we have that permit we're we're getting away from the issue that's before the board
on this case which is the trailer well in order for example look one second before we continue the actually the the fence is important to this because in order to park the trailer behind the fence to be in compliance correct and that's the that's the point he's making is he may need additional time to obtain a survey to make sure that the fence is built in the proper place correct he has his permit
so did you provide a survey to the city yes okay so he has then we're good you need to just follow what's on your survey okay and your permit myself and then when you do a final they'll come out and they'll check and make sure that it's installed correctly otherwise your neighbor will be calling
like he has before okay maybe i can help move this along so sir how much time do you need to erect the fence and get the final inspection from the city the same as the property stuff so you're putting
up the fence yeah i like i say i don't know when this guy's going to be available to help me do it like i said i can't do it myself we we understand that if we're going to go forward we're going to
find that there is a violation and we're going to be giving you a date by which you have to correct debate the violation which is why i'm asking you as a courtesy how much time you think you need to get the fence in a month 30 days yes sir so if we use the same december 5th date that we used on the previous case on the previous motion please that would be adequate time for you it will be yes sir okay good okay um if there are no further questions i'll entertain a motion jeremy reynolds
i move in case number 25-1915 city of dunedin versus class so sure that the board find the respondent violation of city code section 105-27.1.1 subsection f subsection 1 and 5 relating to the dunedin zoning district design standards for houses and duplexes and storage of utility traders boats recreational vehicles and other equipment i further move that the board ordered respondent to bring the property located at 1209 royal oak drive into compliance by december 5th 2025 if the property is not in compliance by that date a final fine of 150 dollars per day shall be imposed beginning on december 6 2025 the cost of and the fine should not exceed the cost of enforcement and continue until uh compliance is verified the respondent would be ordered the contact code compliance office for re-inspection to confirm compliance with this order i so move thank you
a second oh council so just to because this is not your order your motion is not necessarily laura you need to speak clearly and loudly his mr reynolds motion is not necessarily the same as your template motion so just to make sure every board member heard specifically what his motion was he said the fine shall accrue daily not until compliance is until compliance you do not use until compliance is met i believe you use the language shall not exceed the enforcement cost correct correct so so the intent
is that 150 fine would run per day until compliance is met if he meets compliance within the time frame then than the total cost of enforcement the total cost of the fine would not exceed cost of enforcement
okay okay but maybe i can make this easier it sounds as though mr reynolds that you have drafted your your own motion rather than using the motions that have been prepared by council and put before each of the board members i think uh in the interest of consistency it would be best if you use one of the prepared motions um that is before the board rather than your own well chair i really didn't do anything
outside of what the format is other than to add that the fine should not exceed the cost of enforcement where that option is within discretion of the board but not represented within the template we either a need to make the template that's dynamic it'll abort that or b the template actually pins in the board and
doesn't allow it to extra flexibility okay the the the costs of enforcement are not a matter that this board has any jurisdiction over again we're not trying to take the cost of enforcement we're trying to
dictate the the amount of the fine which is within our discretion the the fine is a matter of statute
again if you cannot use the prepared motions that are before you i would either ask that you withdraw your motion use the prepared motion or i'm going to put it before the board for a second and we'll
see where it goes oh thank you thank you um board chair may i add uh mr ernell is within his authority to amend the motion so long as it properly identifies the case the property the location of the property and so forth uh just wanted to let the board know this motion is not the same as your template motion and it does create that maximum shall not exceed the enforcement cost so it does create that maximum of the accrual of the fine to them we don't know what the enforcement cost is at this time um you know it potentially may be lower than what we've seen before i just want to put forward that to the board because i think that was not noticed on the prior case um however you know once again the board is free to second the motion if it has support or and vote on it vote it down if it does not agree okay so where
we are procedurally is that we have a motion uh it contains language that is not set forth in the template motions that are before you uh it includes an unknown variable which is the cost of enforcement um i'll ask for a second if there's no second we'll move forward do i have a second i don't hear one mr reynolds what's your privilege do you want to use a prepared motion no sir i i i i respectfully uh
decline i think this board does have an onus to to limit the scope of those fines whenever there are extinguishing circumstances that was the purpose and intent and to to be chastised from the board chair for for trying to go above and beyond to to help an individual who's in a dire spot i i really don't
appreciate it thank you it was not my intent certainly would not wish to chastise you i i i respect the amount of time and effort you put into this um the problem is that your motion had an unknown variable which this board doesn't have control over we're a hearing body we're we're not part of the city we're not part of the enforcement process okay so we do not have a second i'll entertain
a motion dan waldick a motion thank you i move in case number two five dash one nine one five for the property located at one two zero nine royal oak drive find the respondent claus sure in violation of the city of dunedin code sections dco section one zero five dash two seven dot one dot one dot one parent f parent one and parent five to come into compliance by december 5th if not in compliance a fine of fifty dollars will be imposed until compliance is met the respondent is ordered to contact the code compliance office for a re-inspection of the property to verify compliance
with this order thank you i'm looking for a second second thank you roll call please mr gillette
aye mr bulldog aye miss hunt aye mr sweetser aye mr reynolds nay mr alexander aye chair stone
aye the motion passes in an order will issue um that concludes the new cases that are before us this afternoon i believe um we are on item six of the agenda other business uh 6a uh code enforcement board member comments does any member of the board wish to make a comment i just have a a comment so i could just state your name so the transcript sure jerry reynolds i just have a comment suggestion
um take a look at the the written communication that goes towards um respondents and if we're not putting them on notice not to do ex parte communication can we add that piece to it could you repeat sure so so like when we're quasi-judicial board right so when somebody does like a development application they're put on notice hey this is what ex parte communication is please don't do this i don't know if that's present in our code enforcement process i just want to make a suggestion that it
should be okay we'll take that under advancement and we can propose a policy cool okay thank you
any other board member comments no um so 6ab would be city attorney comments laura you have something to
follow up on the memorandum that was yes sir i do uh we do have a finalized memorandum regarding the presentation from our october hearing um our city attorney is doing the final stamp of approval we are intending to share this memorandum with the city manager as we think it's best fit this is mostly beneficial for city staff and the city manager to have a copy of um you know our goal is to share this with you weeks prior to our december hearing so you'll have a written copy that's the goal right now i think most of you have my email so feel free to share any questions you may have once you get a good look and get to read that finalized memorandum but as of now we're working towards that final stamp of approval and we are hoping to share that with city staff and our city manager
any questions for council looking forward to reading it okay well thank you very much for doing this and we look forward to the next step okay city staff comments questions no sir accolades no okay our next meeting then would be on the first tuesday of december which is december 2nd will we have an issue with any holiday quorums or anything like that no okay all right then um i'll entertain a motion to adjourn jeremy reynolds i so move thank you a second anybody lisa hunt second thank you all those in favor hi hi okay and the meeting is concluded at 2 49 p.m thank you