go ahead and call the meeting to order um i do want to take notice that uh if there is anybody here that is not on the agenda uh that would like to speak um you all are on the agenda so i think we're good no do you all want to speak no just observing okay fantastic perfect all right going back to the top opening statements uh and statement of purpose before proceeding i will set forth the purpose of this board the code enforcement board is charged with conducting hearings to determine whether a violation of the codes and ordinances of the city of dunedin has occurred in order to meet that obligation all parties or their representatives will be allowed the opportunity to be heard on matters relevant to the alleged violation all witnesses offering testimony or presenting evidence will be required to swear or affirm that the testimony they offer is the truth the city through its staff will present its evidence of the alleged violation after the city has completed its presentation the respondent shall be afforded the opportunity to present its evidence any members of the board the person presenting the city's case or the city attorney may question any witnesses before the board the respondent or his or her representative shall also be permitted to question any of the witnesses before the board and present a brief opening and closing statements if so desired the board will then openly deliberate considering only the evidence presented the law and common knowledge by motion duly made and second seconded discussed and approved by at least four members of the board in order will be issued the order will contain the findings of fact conclusions of law affirmative action to be taken the order will be forwarded to the respondent by certified mail i'll ask everybody to please put your cell phones on silent and we will proceed uh first order on the agenda is the uh consent agenda first item i'm sorry consent agenda and that would be the approval of the draft minutes to the code enforcement board meeting from july 7th if there are no changes additions or corrections i'll entertain a motion to accept the minutes as submitted lisa hunt moved to accept the minutes i need a second second sweets are second okay i've got a motion and a second any further discussion hearing none i'll call for the vote thank you mr gillette miss hunt aye miss ballard aye mr sweetser aye mr alexander aye thank you next item on the agenda is the testimony oath of staff and public so anybody who will be testifying today will need to be sworn in perfect uh i have affidavits of compliance uh first case case number two six dash three eight five city versus uh lara michael a and i will turn it over to staff who will be presenting that would be me thank you good afternoon board members uh my name is rachel laurel city dunyeden code compliance inspector testifying in reference to case number 26-385 the property is located at 1670 country lane at the july 7 2026 hearing the board ordered a correction of the violation by july 21st 2026 or a fine of 150 dollars per day shall be imposed i inspected the property on july 15th 2026 and found that the violation was corrected so i am submitting the affidavit of compliance to the board for the board's approval okay board members looking for an affidavit of compliance uh jillette i'll make it a affidavit please so i move into case uh 26-385 for a property located at uh 1670 county lane to find a respondent uh laura uh michael a laura lara did correct violations of sections uh dco uh section 105-27 1.1.1 f1 and 5 honor before the compliance date of july 21st 2026 and to accept the affidavits of compliance we got a motion in a second go ahead is the compliance date july 21st or july 15th it's july 21st 21st okay i need a second please lisa hunt second we've got a motion and a second any further discussion hearing none i'll call for the vote mr gillette aye miss hunt aye miss ballard aye mr sweetser aye mr alexander aye okay motion passed and order will be issued moving on case number 26-432 a city versus michael lara 1670 country lane rachel yes good afternoon board members uh my name is rachel laurel city of dunedin co-compliance inspector testifying in reference to case number 26-432 the property is located at 1670 country lane at the july 7 2026 hearing the board ordered a correction of the violation by july 21st 2026 or a fine of 50 per day shall be imposed i inspected the property on july 15 2026 and found that the violation was corrected so i am submitting an affidavit of compliance to the board for the board's approval board members lisa hunt i move in case 26-432 for the property located at 1670 country lane to find the respondent michael a lara did correct the violation of code section 302.8 motor vehicles on or before the compliance date of july 21st 2026 and to accept the affidavit of compliance today august 11th 2026 alexander second i've got a motion and a second further discussion hearing none i'll call for the vote mr gillette hi miss hunt hi miss ballard hi mr sweetser hi mr alexander hi okay motion carries and order will be issued that is all for the affidavits of compliance moving on to old business we have case number 26192 city versus peter kurob 1396 over cash drive good afternoon board members my name is rachel laurel city of dunedin co-compliance inspector testifying in reference to case number 26-192 the property is located at 1396 over cash drive at the june 2nd 2026 hearing the board ordered a correction of the violation by july 2nd 2026 or a fine amount of 150 dollars per day shall be imposed i inspected the property on july 6 2026 and i found that the violation was not corrected i also draw by the property today august 11th 2026 and found that the violation still remains so i am submitting the affidavit of non-compliance to the board for the board's approval okay board members do you have any recommendations they're gonna he's gonna be fined 150 dollars per day um lisa um did he um did he end up get did you end up getting any of the um of the mail back to you signed by him not signed by him it came back unclaimed but i did post the property okay in city hall and you've talked to him since i haven't talked to him since at all he left the mess this uh i think it was his father somebody did call and leave a message let me look at my notes uh steve carew on may 11th he did call after hours and he told me that he received my notice my door hanger i'm sorry my door hanger right and that he was going to correct the violation it was for a dilapidated fence he they just needed to nail in a few slats well they removed all the slats i have pictures as of today if you would like to see looks the same with the they actually removed the oh it's worse yeah okay yes they only needed to put between five and ten slats up to correct the violation they left the frame up but they removed all the slats okay i don't know why and i haven't had and they haven't had you haven't had any conversation with them saying that it's in the works or anything right no okay that would have been something yeah not since that one voicemail okay back in may thank you so much yes do we need to accept these to review yes yes just pass it around and i'll make a official thank you alexander and there was a previous that this has been to the board before and this is so this is old business this is old businesses uh went before the board in june june 2nd and they gave 30 days to comply and their last communication was yeah we'll take care of it and when was that that was a voicemail that i received on may 11th so that was before the hearing correct and no other communication since then none so the city has introduced requested introduction of two images showing the property dated august 11th and to evidence and the board sets those images yes thank you there are no further questions for staff i'll entertain a motion may alexander an additional question is there an indication of hardship with this person or this this resident do we have any reason to believe that there is a hardship is that okay to ask i don't know because i never actually spoke to him he left the voicemail not peter but a steve ruby whoever he is to the property owner i just received the voicemail after hours back in may okay so we have no indication what's going on with the resident them or or any circumstantial information i have no idea they're maintaining the trash cans are going out to the curb and they're mowing other than that i don't i don't know never met anybody okay that is an okay question to ask thank you i'm not known for my political correctness okay uh board members uh entertain a motion i believe we're looking at motion number four okay there's a shot lisa hunt i move in case two six dash one nine two city versus uh for the property located at one three nine six over cash drive to find the respondent peter carrub did not correct the violations of code section three zero two point seven accessory structures on or before the compliance date of july 2nd july 2nd july 2nd oh that's the one okay july 2nd 2026 and to accept the affidavit affidavit of non-compliance based on the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation and any previous violations committed by the violator this is determined to be a minus for 150 a day is 150 a day minor it's it's that's a factual determination um you've made that original determination at the first hearing do we have catherine do we have the minutes from the first hearing so we that we can confirm the board's determination and i do i have the july ones i don't have the june i have it written down it did say 150 a day but my question is is that minor or severe it's minor okay yeah it depends base but you want to be essentially you want to conform to whatever that determination was at your first hearing okay perfect so we want to line with that and any previous violations committed by the violator this is determined to be a minor violation and a fine of 150 dollars per day is imposed from the date from the date of july 2nd 2026 until compliance is met the respondent is ordered to contact code compliance for a re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this order thank you board members i need a second sweet through second i've got a motion in the second any further discussion i'll call for the vote mr gillette hi miss hunt hi miss ballard hi mr sweetser hi mr alexander hi okay motion has passed and order will be issued next case case number 26-349 city versus david ritter 1776 pasadena drive good afternoon board julie phillips co-compliant supervisor and this will be in regards to case 26-349 for accessory structures for the property located at 1776 pasadena drive at the hearing on june 2nd 2026 the board ordered the correction date of july 2nd 2026 or a fine in the amount of 150 per day the property was inspected on july 8th 2026 and still remains as in violation today and i'm requesting that you accept the affidavit of non-compliance thank you board members do you have any questions sweet sir so has anybody been back since july 7th has anybody been back before the board no i mean any inspections or i went today oh you went today okay did you want to see pictures of today sure thanks a quick question want me to wait till after the picture you can ask it go ahead okay lisa hunt um i also have it written here that it was unclaimed certified mail returned to sender is that still the case it's always unclaimed certified mail that's why i sent it certified and post it so i know that he got it right so nothing nothing nothing back at all since the only thing i received from mr ritter was an email on may 25th that stated he thinks he's in compliance and he will not be available to come to the board june july august or september he considers this matter closed right okay this rings a bell okay thank you so much thank you fresh my memory so this is for 1776 pasadena drive this is a photo that was taken april 10th 2026 you can see a 2x4 holding up the fence that's leaning because there's an accumulation of trash in the backyard this is a fence section that is missing that exposes what's in the backyard that was also taken on april 10th for my re-inspection on july 8th the 2x4 still sits there holding up the fence you can see that the fence is starting to lean these are fence sections that are still missing um taking a picture through the fence you can see on the i guess that would be the south side of the property that the fence is still in bad shape on that side as well there's a better view today i went out there the same two by four is holding up the fence you can see the fence leaning there's still many boards that have not been attached and that fence is leaning on the neighboring fence again on the south side there's missing sections and those are my photos thank you sure board members i'll entertain a motion alexander i move in case 26-349 for the property located at 1776 pasadena drive to find the respondent david ridder did not correct the violations of code sections 302-7 accessory structures on or before the compliance date of july 2nd and to accept the affidavit of non-compliance based on the gravity of the violation any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation and any previous violations committed by the violator this is to be determined this is determined to be a this is well it just it's it's sorry it's first the original motion that was made would have stated so do you have that one yeah can we get a confirmation on the severe minor nature i believe it was minor yeah so i wasn't ready last time but i do believe this one was minor as well offenses are generally minor this is determined to be a minor violation and a fine of 250 it was 250. 150 is imposed from the date of the july 2nd until complaints is met the respondent has ordered to contact code complaints for a re-inspection of the property to verify complaints with this order board members we have a motion on the floor i need a second switzer second i've got a motion and a second discussion no hearing none i'll call for the vote mr gillette aye miss hunt aye miss ballard aye mr sweetser aye mr alexander aye okay okay motion passes unanimously an order will be issued moving on to new business uh case number 26582 city versus matthew g roll trust uh oh there's more sorry and kelly c trust and matthew and kelly c revocable living trust 2673 st joseph's drive east good afternoon board julie phillips co-compliance supervisor i'll be doing a powerpoint presentation for 2673 st joseph drive east case number 26-582 and this is a repeat violation i believe the third time the respondent in this case is matthew and kelly roell trust they reside at 1419 primwood lane in lutes florida 33549 and the zoning is a duplex triplex fourplex located in the mf15 zoning district there's one violation at this property it is a repeat violation for dco section 103-14.8.1 transient uses within certain zoning districts conditional use bed and breakfast intent it is unlawful for any owner of any property within the multi-family zoning districts of the city of dunedin to operate a bed and breakfast without obtaining a conditional use permit from the city's board of adjustment and appeal i posted the property in city hall with an affidavit of posting and notice of repeat violation and a copy was also sent to the owner of record on june 24th 2026 i received the certified mail delivery confirmation excuse me for the notice of repeat violation on june 26 2026 at 12 26 p.m i posted the property city hall with a notice of hearing and sent a copy certified to the owner of record on july 13th 2026 the mail was unclaimed and being returned to sender on august 1st 2026 at 9 40 a.m and i posted the property in city hall with a second notice of hearing because we needed to to postpone in senate certified copy to the owner of record on july 20th 2026 the mail was unclaimed and being returned to sender on august 10th 2026 at 106 p.m this is a copy of my repeat notice of violation that was delivered to an individual at the address this was a copy of the first notice of hearing that was unclaimed and being returned to sender and this is the second notice of hearing that is unclaimed being returned to sender as of today on may 6 2025 case 25-1279 was brought before the dunnean code enforcement board for repeat violation of code section 103-14.8.1 transient uses within certain zoning districts conditional you spend breakfast intent the respondent was not present the board found the respondent to be in violation for two days and was fined one thousand dollars and the fine has not been paid on june 23rd during a routine inspection on rentalscape i found on airbnb that they were advertising their property nautical landings west this is a four unit complex and they do say 90 day reservations however when you go to book it wants you to have a three night minimum stay so i tried to book the property on june 23rd 2026 from july 13th to this july 16th and it took me to the payment page here is a list of the reviews that were left you can see one in april 26 there's already two for may 2026 next to the reviews it says stayed a few nights in the mf-15 you can only rent 90 days or more not less i went back to the website on june 24th 2026 not a nautical landings west on airbnb again it's offering a three night minimum stay i tried to book the property from july 7th to the 10th again taking me to the payment page since that time there were more reviews um in the blue you can see there was three rentals in may stayed a few nights um there's one in april and no excuse me two in april and one following that will probably show up for june later the presentation this is my affidavit of posting and notice of repeat violation that was put on the door on june 24th 2026 there's a close-up this is also my affidavit of posting and notice of hearing that was posted on july 13th 2026 and there's also a close-up of that page on july 17th 2026 i went back to airbnb nautical landings west again still offering a three-night minimum stay tried to book it again from august 1st to the 4th again directing me to the payment page here now we have reviews now we have three from june and another one from may which later in the presentation will show july this is my second posting of notice of hearing that was done on july 20th 2026 a close-up version of that document i went back on the website july 31st 2026 airbnb nautical landings west again it talks about their four plex so we know we have you know the right units and 90-day reservations again offering a three-night minimum stay i tried to book it from august 2nd to august 5th again directing me to the payment page um now the reviews that we have we have two in april three in may in the blue and the one showing in june in pink this i wanted to show you sometimes when they know i'm investigating them if you'll look at july they have that blocked out which it's booked but normally the whole year is blocked out so i would just like to take you to august you can see the 26th or the 22nd 23rd and 24th was booked if you look in september the 19th through the 26th in october you have the first 10 days the last maybe 14 days again this is a 90-day rental you can see their bookings in november and december i went to that page again and they had turned it off so i found them on vrbo nautical landings west and this was on august 10th 2026 again trying to book the property from october 12th to the 16th you can see it's the same listing with the arrow to the left it's one of four suites and nautical landings which can only rent 90 days or more and again it took me to the payment page for four nights i went on that same website this morning and tried to book the property from november 19th to the 22nd again confirming that these are the four suites and it took me again to the payment page um on this calendar it shows a different view of the calendars and how many times they have booked through august and september october this year november this year we've got december and they're already booking out into january february and march of 2027 and at this time i'll let the board deliberate do you have any questions sweet sir so am i correct that this was in violation back in 25 and that that fine was unpaid to date so a thousand dollars for this actual the same property owner we'll go back to 2021 um they became before the zoning board to try to have it rezoned when you're when you have a property on the causeway in this particular um street saint joseph everybody that lines the water is multi-family 15 so you're 90 days or more if you're more inland you're considered a tourist facility so you can have the option to rent the lesser than 90 days but he doesn't have that and they denied his request in 2021 i brought him back before the board on february 8th 2023 and he ended up complying i brought him before the board on may 7th 2024 there was a fine for four thousand dollars he paid that fine i brought him back before the board on may 5th 2025 he was fined one thousand dollars and that fine has not been paid alexander if i recall when he came up he was just apologetic oh it was a mistake right and very pleasant individual yes okay that was the same person the fine has not just a quick question the fine has not been paid but he has come into compliance from the prior case correct the 2020 25 um it changes and then he goes back into violation it's just non-stop again he's been to the board the 23rd 2023 2024 2025 when now we're in 2026 okay so he came into compliance at some point and now this is a new case that he's now in violation okay correct okay do you have a recommendation i do so my recommendation for case 26-582 violation being one repeat violation for dco section 103-14.8.1 transient uses within certain zoning districts conditional use bed and breakfast intent i'm requesting a fine the amount of 500 per day for the following dates june 23rd june 24th july 17th july 31st august 10th and august 11th tolling three thousand dollars okay thank you board members lisa i have a question i was listening but i don't understand why it's only these days and some days it's blocked off and i can't capture it going to the payment page gotcha um you know if we were all willing to go to reviews sometimes you could do that they do have four units in that building you know i like to do it when i know it's a set fine i don't like guessing games if i can book it you're in violation gotcha and they turn it off they turn it on then they go to vrbo then they go to airbnb and there's so many properties in the city i can't spend all my time on him but when i go in and check i would like to find him for each day he's in violation of course can i ask didn't we determine that there was a better way to do this with the bed and breakfasts wasn't there a different way that we could do this are you referring to a specific prior case no no no just bed and breakfast and in general i don't recall specifically for this violation coming before the board okay do you have a yeah i mean i thought we talked about this extensively about there being a different way it could be to keep her time free because like she said it's you would need one person totally dedicated to this situation throughout the city i recall that conversation yes so i don't recall the outcome with their recommendations made to city staff okay well despite those recommendations city staff is still able to cite the violations and yes of course there might be some alternative ways that is correct okay seeking an injunction maybe that's kind of something that coming up maybe nuisance activity as well that can be taken administratively um but in the future correct those are alternative remedies available to them but code enforcement is still one of those um available enforcement tools and remedies per se of course um you have a date certain so essentially you know you they can do date certain compliance to assess the total fine or they can just let it run as a repeat violation they presented their recommendation to be um date certain so okay yeah but thank you welcome board members i think we're ready for a motion sweet sir um repeat violation i may ask what's motion for am i correct so it's a repeat so it's motion eight eight it's my motion eight yeah we are going to need um we are we are going to need the dates from the prior case that he was out of compliance no the prior the prior case because you kind of have to identify the prior case in this motion new motion template it's a new motion template i wrote down may 5th may 2025 may 7th 2024 those are the only two dates i had prior that they were not you want the prior dates yeah the prior date said he was out of compliance being as it's a repeat violation she wants the prior date so the last one was may 6th 2025 i have that as the board as the order date i have that correct date but the out of compliance dates do you know if i don't have the order but for the two days i don't have that with me you don't have the prior order katherine do we have the prior order from um it's a it's a new template okay julie i don't want to confuse you for that yeah yeah it is we're working under the new motion templates and we haven't had a repeat come before us yeah i i don't have the exact dates in this in the the agenda packet i can get them if you like um can you pull the order it's it's uh the maces 2025 for case 25 12 75 yeah i i don't have that with me i'm happy to get it though if you need to i don't sorry we need them for the motion so um okay we can we can we can we can we can just cite to the order skip that first part and just cite to the where it says pursuant you see where it says pursuant to the board's order on case and then give them the case the case number is 25 12 75. so when you're when you're speaking your motion that's the prior case 25 dash 12 75. okay so when i pause maybe i there's a lot of dates here yeah it is it's a lot of dates on this new template okay and just to correct the first dates the case was 25 12 79 are you saying 12 75? yeah that's the one i found on the nov so it's 79 is that the correct that's what i have on here 12 79 okay so let's make that correction it's 12 79 25 12 79. do your best and i'll i'll thank you well we'll we'll amend it don't worry this is the first time we're doing the repeat on this template okay so okay all right okay i move in case number excuse me i move in case number uh 26-582 city versus matthew g roll trust kelly c roll trust matthew g and kelly g uh roll living trust the that's the number located at two six seven three saint joseph's drive east was previously found to be in violation of city of dunedin code section 103-14.8.1 from so we'll skip that okay i could put okay pursuant to the board's order case number was that 25 12 799 7 9 7 9 7 9 7 9 okay dated dated mate sits 2025 may 6 2025 pursuant to the board has again violated the city of dunedin code section 103-14.8.1 from 6 23 to 8 11 compiling of six states 6 23 6 24 7 17 7 31 8 10 8 11 okay based on the gravity of this violation any actions taken by the violator to correct the violation and any previous violation and committed by the violator a fine of three thousand dollars is imposed from the date of the respondents was out of compliance from june 23rd to august 11th with a daily fee of 500 not to exceed 20 days the respondent has not paid the total fine amount of three thousand dollars one thousand he hasn't paid the one thousand right that was last year prior no not from 2025 no no no we're we're sticking to the current total which is the three thousand right five hundred dollars a day for six days totaling three thousand okay okay counsel do you need to read anything into the record before we second that if you would like to postpone your you know this portion until you do our next case i can go get my file and then you can read it in after properly would that be better no it's a it's okay i think as long as we can identify if we're certain about that order um the case number because if i can properly identify the order by the date and case number then that that should be sufficient um no i need the prior case that's 20 this is our current case and this was maces okay we can we can move forward if any board member would like to um second the motion board members i need a second alexander second i've got a motion and a second any further discussion hearing none i'll call for the vote mr gillette hi miss hunt hi miss ballard hi mr sweetser hi mr alexander hi thank you i'll be sure for repeat violations i'll be sure to have all of the the dates and orders going forward thank you okay perfect sorry about that carries unanimously and uh order will issue moving on case number 26-245 city versus iona iona capas 180 milwaukee avenue yes ma'am good afternoon board my name is inspector michelle gilbert i am presenting a case for 180 milwaukee avenue case number 26-000245 respondent is iona capas resides at 180 milwaukee avenue dunedin florida 34698 zoned r60 single-family residential number of violations are two violations first one is land development code section 105-27.1.1.1.1 b1 i3 site standards for horses and duplexes vehicle parking standards all types required parking every residential house or duplex shall have two required parking spaces one of which may be inside a garage no parking is allowed in or on any city right of way or sidewalks and curb lawns second is international property section international property maintenance code section 302.8 motor vehicles an operative or unlicensed motor vehicle shall not be parked kept or stored on any premises and vehicles shall not be at any time be in a state of major disassembly disrepair or in the process of being stripped or dismantled a notice of violation was sent certified mail and posted to property posted to city hall and emailed to the property owner on 3-24-2026 with a compliance date of 4-3-2026 i received a certified mail confirmation for the notice of violation as being returned to the city on april 14th 2026 at 1 24 pm a notice of hearing was sent certified mail posted to property and posted to city hall on 7-10-2026 and then a second notice was sent because we had to to postpone uh the first hearing um was sent certified mail posted to property posted to city hall due to revised hearing date uh 7-24-2026 i received certified mail delivery confirmation for a notice of hearing for the first hearing date return unclaimed august 4th 2026 at 1 35 pm and for the second hearing date a reminder for redelivery august 1st 2026 at 12 pm here you can see the notice of violation that was sent certified mail 3-24-2026 and returned on claim to the city april 14th 2026 at 1 24 pm notice the hearing sent certified mail 7-10-2026 and then returned unclaimed 8-4-2026 at 1 35 pm this is the second notice hearing that was sent certified mail that was sent certified mail on july 24th 2026 with a reminder to schedule redelivery august 1st at 12 pm this is the property appraiser for pinellas county verifying her mailing address as 180 milwaukee avenue in dunyeden florida as you can see there is an unlicensed silver dodge caliber parked on the right-of-way grass on 39 2026 directly beside the no parking sign at any time as silver dodge a caliber parked on the grass with no tag present on vehicle checked with david and this this car is not registered to the property owner at all so an unlawful tag was placed under her wiper blade on march 10th of 2026 as you can see the front bumper is missing and it remained there march 12th illegally parked on the grass right by the no parking sign on the 18th of march i went back and the unlawful tag was removed and replaced with a pink note stating that somebody was interested in purchasing the car on march 18th vehicle remained illegally parked on the grass by the no parking sign on the 23rd the vehicle remained illegally parked on the grass with the no parking sign then the night of notice the violation was posted to the front door march 24th of 2026 and on that date march 24th 2026 you can see that the vehicle remains illegally parked on the grass beside the no parking sign and the pink note was removed at this time april 1st 2026 the vehicle was moved to an unkept gravel area beside the neighboring driveway april 13th vehicle remains unkept on the unkept gravel area and now has a cover on it april 22nd vehicle remains in the unkept gravel area with the cover on it april 30th 2026 vehicle remains uncovered and in the unkept gravel area again on may 13th the vehicle remains on the unkept gravel area may 26th it remains may 29th still parked in the unkept area june 19th it remains so a notice of hearing was posted to the front door for july 10th of 2026 and you can notice the front of the home uh were showing the posted notice of violation and the notice of hearing nothing was removed from the door and that was july 10th july 10th a vehicle remains covered on the unkept graveled area july 15th it remains uh covered on the unkept graveled area remains unkept on the unkept gravel area july 22nd so the notice of hearing uh was posted to front door july 24th of 2026 that was the second one july 29th the vehicle is still there as you can see it hasn't been maintained i went back today and took pictures for updated uh the the vehicle remains covered on the unkept gravel area property is also overgrown and this is august 11th and this is the front of the home you can still see all the notices are posted to the front door and personal items being stored outside on the front of the property is overgrown and i'll leave it to uh you to deliberate okay board members do you have any questions lisa hunt did you are you not putting in a violation for the for the yard and all the stuff that's all over the well generally her yard is up kept this was just this morning that it's overgrown so at this time no it was i meant the stuff sitting outside and that was she put that out after i had already done all of this okay so that would be a new one moving for but not today i was just showing the condition of the property got you thank you mm-hmm anyone else yeah sweet sir what communications have there been obviously nothing through the mail well i don't it's hard to catch her sometimes she's there sometimes she's not i don't know if she actually lives there it shows that that's why i posted the property appraiser shows that it is her address and where she resides um sometimes she'll come in to talk to talk to us at the uh window sometimes she won't sometimes she'll call us sometimes you know um never an email i haven't well maybe a couple i know julie's got a couple um she keeps saying that she was given approval by engineering to park the car where it's at um and that was back in 2018 when she was brought before the board for the same thing uh by by uh previous inspector mr kepto um now when i spoke to the engineering person david schultz he said that she was told she could park there but it had to be maintained on a regular basis and contained well at the time in 2018 it was done and it it was done she put gravel down she did not contain it um and it hasn't been taken care of since so it's been overgrown i mean she just keeps running back and forth there's a um in the front portion there's a water meter of some sort for a sprinkler system that just keeps getting well obviously the car's not moving you can see by the pictures that i had so i mean all the city wants her to do is get a tag on it get it registered with the state and she can park it there but she just has to maintain the area um and put new gravel down and contain it that's it that's all we need her to do so yes okay thank you do you have a recommendation i do thank you my recommendations for case number 26 dash 000245 for the number of violations being two land development code section 105-27 uh 0.1.1.1 parenthesis b parenthesis 1 parenthesis i parenthesis 3 site standards for housing and duplexes vehicle parking standards all types and international property maintenance code 302.6 exterior property areas motor vehicles requesting compliance honorable for july 28th of 2026 or given the severity obviously not july um august 2026 or given the severity of the violations is minor i am requesting a fine on the amount of 150 per day per violation for each day the violations continue to exist okay board members i'll entertain a motion clarification sweet so it's august 20 yes my my apologies typo yes okay august thank you so is it 150 per day per violation because there's two violations yes okay thank you got it okay i can make a motion jillette so i move into case uh 26-245 for the property located at 180 milwaukee avenue fine respondent iona campus in violation of the city don't even codes sections ldc sec 105-27 1.1.1 b 1 i 3 and ipmc 302.8 to order the respondent to come into compliance by august 28th 2026 um if not compliance a fine of 300 hours will be imposed until uh per day until compliance is met the respondent is ordered to contact the code enforcement the code compliance officer for re-inspection of the property to verify compliance with this order just so we're going to need to specify that it's 150 per day per violation just to avoid any confusion because it is a 250 mats but you can you can do them per violation but it's still 250 mats so we don't want to avoid that confusion of the 300 um being above so just if you would like to amend yeah just propose a friendly amendment to violation so just be like amend the 300 to the 150 per day per violation okay i'm making that i'm making an amendment to 150 per day per violation thank you okay i've got a motion on the floor i need a second lisa hunt second i've got a motion and a second any further discussion hearing none i'll call for the vote thank you mr gillette aye miss hunt aye miss ballard aye mr sweetser aye mr alexander aye okay motion carries unanimously and order will be issued okay moving on to other business uh code enforcement board member comments do we have any okay hearing none uh city attorney comments no thank you for bearing with me today city staff comments um i do have the information required for 2673 st joseph drive if you wanted to write it in for the record if you needed or you can you can proceed yeah so to verify the case was 25-1279 and the two dates were april 24th 2025 and april 25th 2025 two days for a thousand dollars okay perfect thank you thank you thank you okay set next meeting date of september 1 2026 so uh catherine will be emailing everybody and uh yeah i just want to thank everybody again for um being flexible and understanding um yeah so we're back to the first tuesday again so excellent okay no further business to come before this board i'll entertain a motion to adjourn second that awesome okay we are we are adjourned i don't want to do it that long