okay good afternoon everyone we're going to call this meeting of the community with redevelopment agency to order chair Burns here vice-chair market here deputy vice-chair Cassell and Commissioner Carney okay can I get a motion and a second for the approval of the agenda I don't share yes hi I wanted to make a request to amend the agenda and remove item 8a yes that would have helped with six eight six hundred eight hundred blocks of West Atlantic Avenue okay does that require discussion how do we do that can we just make a motion just make it over can I get a motion to amend the agenda as suggested so moved vice-chair market yes deputy vice-chair Cassell yes commissioner Carney yes and chair Burns yes okay thank you so moved second deputy vice-chair Cassell yes commissioner Carney yes chair Burns yes and vice chair market yes thank you moving right along we public comment is there anyone in the audience are here to make public comment today once going twice seeing none public comment close all right we want to can I have a motion in a second for the regular board meeting minutes we just need to that's on consent so we just need a motion to approve the consent agenda motion to approve this consent agenda we have a motion may I have a second I'll second it okay commissioner Carney yes chair Burns yes vice chair market yes and deputy vice chair Cassell yes okay moving right along so now we are we've just changed the 8a so we will be on 8b we're gonna have to do one of our commissioner and all Frankel's meetings all right we're gonna be Frankel all right let's keep it going we're gonna keep it going okay so this item is coming back there was discussion at a previous meeting about adding an item to discuss potential due diligence studies for properties located at three three three zero three three five zero and three three eight or sorry three five eight north east 4th Street and at 240 sorry 2400 and 2410 North Federal Highway these two properties are depicted in these maps this is the first one the artist alley area properties we've discussed these warehouses before so we're just bringing this back to see if there's any interest in conducting a due diligence study to see what could be built here we were looking at options of how to increase the affordable workforce housing stock in our district this is the appraisals that came through we did them in two between 2024 and 2025 that came back between 19 to 20 million I believe that the owner is potentially looking for around 20 million if it's a straight purchase like 22 million but is open to negotiating and discussing depending on when this transaction would happen considering market conditions is what I was told the second property is this right here on federal highway also spoke to the owner of this property he's still interested in potentially a sale he's also interested in the option of him developing or his company developing the properties and doing some kind of a split where it's 25 percent of workforce housing and 75 percent as market rate but he would be looking for assistance on the workforce portion i'm not sure to what level didn't get that information but he is open to any potential conversations for our purposes we are only looking at hiring an architect because i think what's happened is you know the owners and people on behalf of the owners have kind of made suggestions about what could be built on the properties and how much so we just thought if we wanted to take this type of an investment that we should hire an architect of our own to actually look at the code and see what could be built here um the cost came back at just over 15 000 for both assessments to see what could be built on both properties so we just have this for the board to discuss how um how we're feeling about these two properties and this item all right well i'll i'll just go first and just say that we've had this um on for discussion for quite some time and i think that we owe it to ourselves to at least get the feasibility um study done to do our due diligence so that we know what you know we know for sure what can we can put there so um i'll open it up to the commission yeah i i i second those words uh commit uh madam chair i i i talked to renee about this extensively it's been there for a while i think there's some opportunity here and i think we should spend a little bit a little bit of money and see what we can do with it okay thank you um commissioner cassell well so i look in the beginning when the idea of the 21 million dollar property on northwest fourth came up at our at our cra meeting i was absolutely opposed to it it was overpriced and there were concerns that i had i threw in the uh north federal highway as a comparable to look at um i i don't have any problem necessarily reviewing this but i i only want to do this if we're going to build what we need in our city and that's my concern here you know the idea of market rate versus uh which the owner is suggesting that's a totally separate property and not something we should engage in now if we're talking about building what we need but people up here the two of you have said you don't want you know workforce at that lower level that's what delray needs delray residents need we keep seeing 80 to 120 ami that's not serving the needs so i just feel like before you know maybe we do put the brakes on this we have the acquisition money and i don't like it sitting there i feel like we should be utilizing it i feel like we should be building but i want to make sure we're building what what accommodates and that since the discussion up here was that you we cannot have north federal the gateway to our city have that style of housing then i if that's still the feeling then i in my opinion i would stop and not waste the 15. well it's not that i don't want because i do want what serves this city right however that particular location but at the same time we don't know what we can put wait i'm sorry that particular location what on federal highway what do you it's next to that can you extend that statement that particular location just on federal highway is not suitable for what what are you what are the parameters low low low low income housing where would you have it at what area median income would you be looking at 60 to 80 below 60 absolutely absolutely and have it mixed it would have to be mixed no matter where it is but we could have more of the low in a different area in my opinion however so you wouldn't put low on federal highway next to the budget hour rental motel and cube smart there's a budget rental motel that goes by the hour over there and there's a cube smart and there's a habitat restore it when you look at the city as a whole you have to say to yourself what what can go where and i'm not saying i have that answer but all i'm saying is if this discussion is just going to go to building 80 to 120 ami units that are available for people making over 90 something thousand dollars and i don't see see us serving the needs of our residents well i am all for serving the needs of our residents our teachers our our first responders need a place to live but we don't know anything until we get a study to say what we could so my vote is still get the study so that we can do our due diligence and uh mayor all right a couple of things first of all that little budget motel the guy's hoping to redevelop he's hoping the whole area gets redeveloped so he can redevelop his but that's what's there now and and i've spoken to him about it and you know nice guy i don't know what his plans are um the neighborhood doesn't feel that the low low is the appropriate because what it does it will affect all the other development around it all those other pieces of land that are around it suddenly don't become as attractive to start with you got a density issue up there that nobody wants to increase the density to the extent that people are talking about um and you know this this property is on and look i i i'm of the opinion that we don't have the money for either of them all right so i mean i am of the opinion that i think this board should be focused on getting west atlantic done we've got money we don't know what uh what the money we have in the bank we don't know how much of it we're going to have to use to incentivize people to do the to the the six seven eight hundred block to the old fire station when that gets moved over there's a lot of plans there so you know i mean 15 000 isn't a lot of money for the studies you know i mean personally i i'm not i think that again the north federal location if this would the proposal would have to go through an entire new planning process and approval process and everything it's going to drag everybody out and talk about why they don't want it there that's fine um but if i i still think this focus of this board ought to be dealing with the land that we have and that we've been holding for 15 years that is still laying empty before we start figuring out what other lands we want to buy and maybe or maybe not we could put a project on them that's that's my view so i mean if you if the could i respond for a moment i mean i i don't see why i don't see why we're not focused on just doing using our our the resources that we have to do the six seven eight hundred block the other lots that we have and the the of the lot across the 800 the the eighth and something where the fire station is which we know is going to end up an empty lot that's my view i i definitely agree that the west atlantic corridor should be our priority right i do however these two properties came up um in our discussions well they were different how long when he was walking and so if we want to if we want to focus on the atlantic avenue properties i'm all for that i mean i i just feel that if we're going to consider anything on those two properties we get the feasibility study but definitely i'm all for west atlantic being our priority so i mean on the 2400 block of north federal you know that's 12 units an acre with the boat with the density bonus of doing 25 maybe that's not 15 you know units an acre but we're still guessing but we're still burns could i but that's that's a whole new zoning process and any more density than that the entire neighborhood will hate you if i may already complaining about the having to go two three four traffic light changes at the corner of george bush to go south so it just i i don't think you're going to get the density you want to have there to get it approved because it would be require a zoning change and and the other property may indeed be too expensive because although you can do four units an acre there i haven't seen a design that will work so right even if they get even if they get i mean this is kind of what i used to do even if they get a a a density bonus you know maybe they get to they can probably do about 72 units by right now um maybe they get to a hundred maybe but even so at at at the 2400 20 the the the the property you're in your land cost assuming even giving them the density bonus your land cost is 350 000 360 000 per unit and that's before you put the diamond infrastructure so your key price is 360 000 now you're suddenly taking it out of the with you you're not into the affordable range anymore you're certainly not into the low low range anymore and so the the concept of having a 75 25 blend could work unless they won't work and you know but the affordable housing prices are as everybody knows under under this that's your hundred thousand dollar a year person so it's not going to address what commissioner casal is worried about right you have to go 60 to 80 and so i again i'm going back to we have a finite amount of money 15 000 isn't a lot to spend but i think we should be focusing our dollars on west atlantic commissioner i just want to say one thing first of all we were participated in the island cove project that's affordable true affordable housing and there's no one what miss burns would you argue that that's not attractive housing you would have wanted in the neighborhood have you heard what's happened since the people have been in there it is far from affordable right now but no but my point is we built affordable housing in the idea that you don't want to have that stigma that it's unattractive that it doesn't belong in certain areas of the city because that development is a very attractive development oh it's a yeah exactly so i just wanted to say that because the mayor said people don't want the affordable there and second they don't want low low okay but we're talking now 60 to 80 that's workforce at 60 to 80 that's not low low so let's keep the conversation where we're going and with respect to the the density that you're talking about with the live local the highest density permitted within a mile so technically these two projects because this federal highway is exactly like 0.86 from the um the other property they would have the same allowed density under live local so just looking at it that way based on the size and the shape of the parcel and we went through all the other things the ingress egress on north federal and dixie on one versus one uh access ingress egress which is on fourth which would create stacking issues at the at the uh railroad tracks you also have the fact that that side road is not a road it's an alley we went through all of this stuff before but in and you know not it's not fair to disparage mr long because you were jumping you said get it in the pipolino and you were the other vote to move this forward and the reason why we're still talking about it well here we're here today to decide whether we want to go forward i don't i mean i don't i don't really i i do think we have 15 million in acquisition funds and we should be using it for acquisition i don't want to put it into infrastructure that that's the city's job not not the cra's job the cra acquisition money should be used for acquisitions um you know renee there's talk of potential other properties we could look at we cannot do this i don't mind not doing this i think this has been too problematic for us so i'll say no but i don't want to transfer 15 million in acquisition funds out of acquisitions to go to other projects thank you commissioner market you have anything else you want to say because i am also uh as i said i want affordable housing and housing that fits the residents that we have here however i am for making west atlantic a priority um whether we do a feasibility study or not i'm okay with not doing that um but if we're going to consider we need to study because i'm not a developer or uh engineer or architect so i need the study in order to see how we're going to move forward if we're not going to consider those i'm okay with that yeah i i as i said at the beginning i'm definitely for this um i i think there's a lot of opinions up here and i think that's the perfect reason to do this study is so that we can get an agnostic party to tell us what's what and then from that we can make fact-based decisions i think right now we don't have the facts so i i think it's a it's a big parcel of land it's in the city it's something i think we should be definitely taking a look at and i i don't like to spend money like anybody else but fifteen thousand dollars to get the facts on that so that we can make a really good decision for the city sounds like the right investment for me okay so we need to do we need a motion on this do we what do we need to do on this or did you just need a consent uh well i think a motion would be helpful whichever way we're going to go okay so somebody make a motion please one way or the other and let's see if we can get a second one or the other i move that we don't spend the fifteen thousand dollars for the studies okay can i get a second does this motion die okay so may i have another motion in terms of housing that the city desperately needs i'll second that okay chair burns yes vice chair market yes deputy vice chair cassell yes and commissioner carney sure okay thank you okay moving on to the cra owned lots um item number nine good afternoon commissioners christine tibbs assistant director um so this item is an update on the cra owned lots um that we have previously earmarked to be included as part of the city's inventory list of all real property um that is appropriate for use as affordable housing uh the initial list uh was approved on august of 2023 pursuant to florida statute which is also known as the live local act and then it was updated a year ago in january 2025. um so the lots that were originally included um here's an update on the infill housing that is located uh in north on northwest 8th avenue and northwest 9th avenue you'll see that four of those lots 256 northwest 8th avenue 260 northwest 8th avenue 259 northwest 8th avenue 250 north s northwest 8th avenue those are under a purchase and sale agreement with the clt they are moving through permitting to build a single family home on each lot then on 260 northwest 9th avenue that is also in a purchase and sale agreement but with habitat for humanity of greater palm beach county to also build a single single family residence there and then 238 southwest 14th avenue that is also under a purchase and sale agreement with the boyton beach faith-based cdc to build one single family workforce housing unit there as well and all those uh six homes are moving through the building permit process um so hopefully we'll have another update for you shortly on those six homes very good 106 northwest 10th avenue um that was included in the list originally as well we are trying to uh work with the final property owner to close on that last little sliver so that we can move through a major plot application approval process with the city to replat um seven lots on that northwest 10th avenue and then the yellow box shows the three lots that the cra will continue owning and then put out through an rfp process for the development of three single-family homes 704 oh sorry go ahead okay i think i answered my own question is that the hardaway hanaway property no no no that property is still uh in due diligence okay so we have not closed on that lot just yet okay that is across the street though you'll see it's if i can oh wait oops do i have it on this i don't know if i have a clicker on this it's you'll see yeah right there that's 101 northwest 10th avenue okay and that is the one that we are in a um the due diligence period for and trying to work towards closing um 704 southwest 4th street this is three uh we went through the major plot application process and what was approved in 2025 uh we turned one property into three uh parcels and actually we are in a cone of silence for this because we did issue the rfp um yesterday for the development of three single-family homes on these lots very good and they do all have three separate addresses now so that was worked out before anybody enters the building permit process 111 northwest 11th avenue this is a piece of property that we are still working through some title issues to try to acquire the tiny sliver that is marked out in red there is a dilapidated building that straddles our property which is marked out in blue and once we work out the title issues and acquire that piece of property in red we will demolish the building that is on the property and then go through the minor plat application process to split the lot in two and then put out an rfp for the development of two single-family homes there and then 1300 lake idah road um i'm sure you all remember this piece of property that we purchased last year and uh we were able to go through the minor plat process so we own the property currently in red um we are awaiting uh for the finalization of the city's adu text amendment which just moved through planning and zoning board last night and received a recommendation to for approval to city commission so hopefully we'll be able to move forward with um additional uh development options on this piece of property uh as we see the ad the city's adu text amendment um move through that approval process so number of lots have not been determined for this piece of property yet no we haven't done anything with it quite yet because we are waiting to see what alternative housing um developments can be option yeah options and then so yesterday uh the pz board um got to see see the text amendment for the adus and yeah so it's moving along can i just add something for the um lake ida properties um i know that after the presentation happened at our meeting about the um the study and potential four plexes and all these larger types of housing some of the residents in the area that expressed some concern about having those larger structures like four plexes and things like that so um we know at least that much that that is kind of hitting the threshold so it might be something smaller scale but we would need the full study i just wanted to put it out there in case it comes up again that i think those we we recognize that the larger structures were not um viewed favorably by the residents so when you say the full study you're talking about the adu said yes because it included alternative like cottage style different types of things not just accessory dwelling units and we have the four plexes because that was what we had discussed before because they studied the lots to put the most that you could put on there right but the residents that they came out and kind of expressed some concern about that larger structure so we do know that that is not a um an option that they would like to see so we know that going forward okay thank you so now we are moving on to additional lots that we are proposing to be included in the city's inventory list that would be appropriate for the development of affordable housing um these lots uh these eight lots are within the northwest 600 block of west atlantic avenue um you'll be familiar with these lots because the six lots that are marked out in blue there they are part of our townhouse um design the 12 townhouses that have the detached adu above the garage um so we would like to add uh those lots to the city's inventory list because we are proposing to build um affordable workforce townhouse units there and then the red lots that are fronting northwest first street there those are two single family um zoned lots that we believe would be the appropriate place to place two single family homes in the future very good i'm excited and then we are also proposing to add 216 northwest 8th avenue this is a lot that we acquired um recently and also within another cone of silence because we did issue an rfp yesterday for the development of one single family home on that lot right there on 8th avenue and you'll see that it's fairly close on the same street as um the four lots that the clt is developing or under a purchase and sale contract for is this near spady yes it actually yeah spady's right there on third just on the other side of third okay north up there yep so this was an rfp that was issued yesterday as well and then the last one 29 southwest 6th avenue uh this is the single lot that we own on um southwest 6th avenue it is zoned um rm and so given the current zoning we believe that it's could be a good place to put housing and we only just own that one lot uh we would await again we would await the city's uh finalization of their adu alternative housing um adoption of that text amendment to see what could be put there uh on that lot so at this time uh we would request the board consider the additions to of the CRA owned lots to add to the city's uh inventory list as appropriate for the development of affordable housing and if you agree to that we would update the gis map to reflect the new additions and then just one more thing as the um lots get building permit approval they will fall off the list because we won't own it anymore and they'll be developed cool very good thank you thank you for the presentation i'm very happy to hear all of this affordable housing um i have a question though um but i'll let um any comment i'll start on this side um commissioner cassell no i'm amenable to adding these properties thank you okay um commissioner yeah i'm positive on this as well yes uh uh mayor that's fine okay great with me as well but i wanted to ask a question about this 29 southwest 6th avenue is that the lot that miss selznick and the children came to talk to us about yes yes okay so now is that the lot is very narrow so this this lot is big enough for i mean compared to the other lots on this block same size yes all the same size yes so miss selznick had reached out about potential options for this lot as well so i have a call with her on thursday okay to discuss some potential options that she's proposing to us um regarding this lot so having it on this list all we're doing is just updating our maps so i can bring it updates or email you all and then discuss it next month if you want to do that okay yes because i was really hoping that we could help them out somehow and to get this lot for use of what they need it for through a land sale swap lease whatever but since you have a meeting with her so you can update us later yes i'll update you after the so i think you have the consensus to add this to the commission or whatever we'll update our gis map too yes if we get a motion okay so we do so move yes please i need a second i'll second that chair burns yes vice chair market yes deputy vice chair cassell yes and commissioner carney yes okay and so we have uh the redevelopment um direct committee i'll report and i see we have a copy of that here yes so these are we have the minutes so i just note that the chair of the group was traveling so she was unable to attend today so i'll just provide an update that we met on january 22nd this was our first full meeting with all three members in attendance and we just started talking preliminarily about the property that we purchased in west sorry in osceola park um and we're we have a benefit that the chair does live in osceola park and she invited one of her neighbors to attend the meeting which was great so they live very close to the property um and they actually included him in the discussion about options there um we threw out many different considerations ranging from entertainment to office space to green space park um there is an osceola park neighborhood plan that was completed in 2019 so we started looking through some of that i think the outcome was basically that everyone would take a look at that osceola park plan because i think the concern is that their commercial space is very limited and it's very close to residential so they didn't want to have some sort of louder structure i think someone even threw out a skating rink or a bowling alley and they were like we couldn't park that so there there are some of those things that kind of needed to be worked out but i'm glad that we had the voices from the osceola park residents that would say that might be of a concern to have be so close to the residents there um and they also wanted to invite some of the other residents in the area or in the osceola park area who are pretty prominent and outspoken i guess in their community to attend the meeting so that's basically what we're going to have at our next meeting in march or yeah in march um but it went really well they're very excited about development i just think that there was um a bit of a balance of how intense they would want right something versus not but also balancing that they do have very limited commercial space and how to preserve that base as well so yeah it was an interesting discussion interestingly the there was a bowling alley um back in the day on that same street at the end of that corner oh maybe that's why yes there was a there was a bowling alley uh further south on that same street that's why it came up i think the the discussion was around the younger population just wanting to have some of these things in there was a bowling alley or skating rink one of the other they talked about we talked about both actually so yeah there was one of them when not when i was a teenager we used to go there so it was i can't remember which one it was but there were pictures of course not i actually may have some pictures okay all right so that's basically it yeah okay next meeting is march 12th at our office at 5 30. march march oh mix for the rack for the rack yes correct this is our group okay are there any questions from the board thank you for the update okay so any other business yes a couple updates i actually i'm i'm going to bring up i don't know if i should bring it up in comments but i would like a motion to reconsider that vote as it relates to the to doing the report because i've thought about it i want to be consistent and i want to vote no so on the vote i mean i understand i'm going to lose but i'm sorry on the fifteen thousand dollars on the feasibility study i'm asking for a motion to reconsider and you can do that yes ma'am what what i mean he's a um a reason to desire to change this vote can we just change the vote or we have to do the whole motion over again with over i'm we have to re reconsider you should consider a motion to reconsider the item and if you don't want to reconsider it the vote stands but if you do want to afford him the right to change the vote you would agree to reconsider it motion to reconsider and then another motion yes ma'am correct exactly that's fine so i would make a motion to reconsider the motion the item the item excuse me then i can second that okay yes vice chair market yes deputy vice chair casale sure commissioner carney yes and chair burns yes so the item now is for you for reconsideration go ahead mr markert it was yours if you'd like or i can do it for you go ahead um motion to excuse me for one moment please um approve due diligence studies for properties located at 330 350 358 north east 4th street and uh 2004 and 2 410 north federal highway okay second deputy vice chair casale yes commissioner carney no uh chair burns yes and vice chair market yes thank you because now i'm consistent with what i argued there we go i know you could lose but that's okay it's okay you're right okay it's okay so i said sure which wasn't a yes or a no so i said you know and i think sure is a yes actually in that instance right exactly yeah we need yeses and no right okay i agree i'm not that i appreciate you you know accommodating my whim thank you all right a couple updates yes the ribbon cutting yes so we have a ribbon cutting a double ribbon cutting on thursday we were being cut at the it was a whole building i'm saying we did one there before yes for the whole ribbons to cut over there now we got a lot of ribbons yes so we have two tenants that are there i love it um one's been there not yet not yet we just extended their agreement but they're their work they're starting their work so they had some family things come up but they're moving along um but it's the atlantic current and stellamix will be our the tenants there atlantic current it's been there stella mix is newer we're trying to have multiple ribbon cuttings at one time so we got two so we're like let's let's go forward and do the ribbon cutting what do they do so stella mix is a podcast studio oh yeah i met them yes yes so very nice very group good group yes yes they have a whole built-out space they have three different podcasting rooms essentially it's cool in that small space they really made a good use of 600 square feet and atlantic current um they have the current in the magazine and also uh marketing and photography services as well yes great tenants yes yes yes so we're excited about that um stellamix is a very active involved member with the chamber so we're partnering with the chamber this is all the dda district so we brought them in too so we'll all be together um doing the ribbon cutting uh with the chamber and with the um the dda so we're excited about that so it is thursday january 29th five o'clock at the edmund baines building thank you all right yeah so the 29th is also we're doing the water plant water treatment is in the morning yes 11 o'clock yes all right and then ribbons all day and we're missing the grand opening of the bjs yes i heard i know we all get a discount at the same time they're giving everybody that discounted membership if i get a card in my mail once a week i mean i'm just saying that that's we don't have to do a gift form on that no no no yeah that one everyone gets that i think we should move the water plant open so we can go to you could exactly click coordinated ribbon cuttings all days fifteen dollars for the year fifteen dollar membership yes okay and then friday is the carver square park ribbon cutting so this is right across the street from the carver square homes that we completed a couple of years ago um this is actually chair burns this is one of the first projects that we brought up when you first started on um to redo this park that definitely needed a little bit of tlc so parks and rec was fantastic and designing and coming up with this and there's a big frog to i love the frog pay homage to frog alley it's a real frog a real they grew that big so this is going to be friday morning it's getting nutty it's not even five yet um so it's going to be friday morning january 30th at 10 a.m and this is on the southwest third street corner and southwest 7th avenue so please join us it'll be a lot of fun the 30th this is the 30th this is friday yes and so i have a question about this um i've already received two phone calls this is beautiful love it and a long time coming how is it finished because um one resident she said it doesn't have a cover over it this one was not planned with the cover because and i you know yeah she wants to know will there be one coming and you know i just told her that i would get back with her but so it's finished this is the presentation and no cover this is it so if you remember there was a lot of tree cover right in this over this park and it was cut there was some cutting cutting that happened when the park was installed so i'm sure the trees are going to grow back over if we want to talk about a covering we can talk about that as a future the tree it had a canopy but they were cut back when the yes when they were doing the construction because they have to remove all the equipment no no no they're there you can see it yeah you can see them around okay and you'll see it on friday i think it'll fill in i mean we can you can take a look on on friday and see and if we think that it needs to have a covering i just know a lot of the parks now are having that covering right i think that's what's happening they're going to use that have the covering and this one doesn't have one okay but we can i mean that's something we can look at or unless there was i can talk to parks if there was a reason why but um no this one wasn't planned for a covering i will say it has a swing set and i was told there are not a lot of swing sets they aren't in our park so this is one of the the few that has a real swing set so yes but take a look friday and see what you think about the and then i'll explain that the trees were you know you'll see it people get explanations and you know they understand so the trees were cut back to do the park and you know the canopy natural canopy will come back yes yes that's what we're hoping okay cool like it yes and then we have our socials planned for the year first one is going to be march 4th then june 4th september 3rd and december 3rd so stay tuned we'll have marketing materials coming out about this to come and learn about our projects what we have going on meet us just you know get to know this area a little bit more and that's all i have thank you very much okay thank you and the board attorney nothing to report other than happy new year and i have the benefit of working with your excellent staff to rectify some of these title issues that were referred to thank you uh commissioners commissioner casal i have nothing thank you for your hard work everybody yes nothing i echo commissioner casal thank you for all the work that you guys are doing fantastic it's amazing and we love it yes i'm very sorry you didn't beat adam frankel's record i was working very hard i would have i would have waived everything until next meeting but you know this commission has a lot to say i'll just leave it at that okay yeah so i got up at three o'clock this morning to watch coco cough i'll tell you she lost oh well well it was she'll come back four in the afternoon their time i think it was all right dedicated fan three in the morning she didn't win three you know i was awake at three o'clock in the morning i had raccoons on my porch knocking and scratching at my door oh goodness trying to get in yeah i was wondering like who is that trying to get in and i took pictures of there were four babies never seen oh raccoons at my door at 3 a.m so i didn't see the mother but i wasn't going out to check it out either i was taking i was taking pictures i'll show you the pictures they they're beautiful but i don't want them at my door three in the morning anyway there's a mr bourbon delay mr long can remove those for you raccoons are mean i think feel like we should close the meeting before we can we adjourn before we have our yes those are my those are my comments so all right thank you so much staff all the work you do and i appreciate it so thank you meetings adjourned